Page 1 of 347

Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:22 am
by DigitalGypsy66
I posted this in the TV thread, but might as well start things off with it here:


Rex lives!!!

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:28 pm
by dodint
Did you ever know that you're my heeeeeero?

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 12:33 pm
by Avyran
I want an X-Wing.

Image

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 3:53 pm
by Freddy Rumsen
http://badassdigest.com/2015/04/19/rogu ... d-on-jedi/
Still: so much Rogue One! For one thing we learned that the spin-offs are actually called Anthology films, and the full title is Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One. The Anthology films will be all sorts of genres, all sorts of stories, all sorts of scale, and they'll allow Lucasfilm to work with emerging directorial talent and also introduce new characters into the Star Wars universe. Does this mean the rumors of them being origin stories are out the window?

This much is certain: Rogue One is no origin story. It's a sidequel, telling the tale of the heisting of the Death Star plans, the ones that Princess Leia hid in R2D2. So no, no Bothans will die in this movie. But other characters might! Gareth Edwards, who is directing the 2016 film, said "It's called Star WARS," and his crew is full of people who worked on war films like Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down and Zero Dark Thirty. In fact Creig Fraser, who shot Zero Dark Thirty, will shoot Rogue One.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 4:31 pm
by Kaiser
I request a tifosi rant about how the X-Wing development is bankrupting the rebellion

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 4:45 pm
by meow
I'd like to hear that argument.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:36 pm
by tifosi77
Well, the Incom T-65 was badly in need of an update. At the time of its introduction, it represented an almost unbeatable combination of speed, maneuverability, affordability and lethality. It was reminiscent of the Northrop F-20 Tigershark, which - inexplicably - no one in the entire world ever wanted. The new T-70 appears to have all the bells and whistles, since it was developed in an Empire-less world. (Or at least a world where the Empire wasn't quite the shiznit it once was) There are already some noticeable differences from the iconic T-65, but whether they are performance related or low-observable concessions, only time will tell. Mostly, I think it's just looks neat.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 7:42 pm
by Freddy Rumsen
:fist:

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 7:45 pm
by PFiDC
Well, the Incom T-65 was badly in need of an update. At the time of its introduction, it represented an almost unbeatable combination of speed, maneuverability, affordability and lethality. It was reminiscent of the Northrop F-20 Tigershark, which - inexplicably - no one in the entire world ever wanted. The new T-70 appears to have all the bells and whistles, since it was developed in an Empire-less world. (Or at least a world where the Empire wasn't quite the shiznit it once was) There are already some noticeable differences from the iconic T-65, but whether they are performance related or low-observable concessions, only time will tell. Mostly, I think it's just looks neat.
You ****

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:16 am
by blackjack68
Mark Hamill felt "forced" to do new film.

http://www.businessinsider.com/star-war ... ing-2015-4

Because he's sooooo busy...and yes, I know about the voiceover and Flash stuff.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:25 am
by PFiDC
Oh I'm sorry. I had no idea asking you to reprise the only role you will ever really be known for was such a chore. Enjoy your Star Wars royalties....

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:26 am
by blackjack68
And Fisher insisted her daughter be in the film as well.

Cause she's soooo busy too.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:28 am
by shafnutz05
Mark Hamill felt "forced" to do new film.

http://www.businessinsider.com/star-war ... ing-2015-4

Because he's sooooo busy...and yes, I know about the voiceover and Flash stuff.
hahah give me a break. Like you said, sure he has had other projects but by and large he disappeared after 1983. Harrison Ford is ten years older than you and in much more of a position to turn down work.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:28 am
by PFiDC
I heard a rumor that Fisher declined payment for her first role in Star Wars (she was loaded already anyway) in exchange for something like 1-3% of everything Star Wars ever makes. Anyone know of the validity of that rumor?

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:31 am
by blackjack68
If true, she was a genius.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:34 am
by blackjack68

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:37 am
by DigitalGypsy66
That business insider article has a link to the YouTube video panel with Hamill. It's long, but a pretty good listen.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:49 am
by PFiDC
It looks like 1/4 of a point. Still not bad. That's only for Episode IV though I think.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 9:52 am
by NAN
I'm pumped for these new films.

Lucas was great for dreaming up the story/universe, but my got, outside of the original Star Wars, he pretty much ruined the prequel as a director.

I just hope they don't go overboard and have one new film like every year and we have mass overload.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:24 am
by Freddy Rumsen
The Red Letter Media reviews of the prequels should be put into the Smithsonian as an American treasure.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:36 am
by tifosi77
I heard a rumor that Fisher declined payment for her first role in Star Wars (she was loaded already anyway) in exchange for something like 1-3% of everything Star Wars ever makes. Anyone know of the validity of that rumor?
That's how George Lucas was paid. When things started going screwy during production, he offered up his director's salary to go back into the production budget. In return, he said he wanted the merch rights, plus backend participation (both of which were novel concepts in 1976/7). Alan Ladd at 20th Century Fox sort of snickered before agreeing........ and ultimately got fired because of it.

Thankfully, he wasn't fired before greenlighting 'Alien'. ;)

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:07 pm
by Clams Herbert
I posted this in the TV thread, but might as well start things off with it here:


Rex lives!!!
It'll be very interesting seeing Ahsoka, Vader and Rex all run into each other considering how much time they were together in The Clone Wars.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:50 pm
by Dickie Dunn
The Red Letter Media reviews of the prequels should be put into the Smithsonian as an American treasure.
Those reviews make the existence of the prequel trilogy worthwhile.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:51 pm
by tifosi77
They truly are the only good things that came out of Eps I-III.

Star Wars discussion

Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:11 am
by NAN
They truly are the only good things that came out of Eps I-III.
Image