NFL
NFL
It would have taken quick thinking but he really should have thrown it away instead of running the way he did.
-
- Posts: 14274
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:45 pm
- Location: Phil Kessel's name is on the Stanley Cup. Thrice.
NFL
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
-
- Posts: 32298
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
NFL
Hell of a snag by Ertz
-
- Posts: 32298
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
NFL
Saquon only needs 100 yards to break the rushing record and the Eagles play the Giants next Sunday. If they rest him they should be disbanded as a franchise
-
- Posts: 12965
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:04 pm
- Location: Orlando, FL
NFL
Or they play him and he gets hurt and isn't 100% for the playoff game the next week.MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:58 pm Saquon only needs 100 yards to break the rushing record and the Eagles play the Giants next Sunday. If they rest him they should be disbanded as a franchise
You really don't think before you say things sometimes huh. But I guess that's what hot take culture produces.
-
- Posts: 32298
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
NFL
Yes, that is what can happen. Still play him
NFL
If you ask Saquon 10 times if he'd rather have the record or a Super Bowl, he'd say Super Bowl 10 out of those 10.
Risking a blown ACL or sprained ankle (which he's done more than once) just to hit some arbitrary number is stupid.
Risking a blown ACL or sprained ankle (which he's done more than once) just to hit some arbitrary number is stupid.
-
- Posts: 32298
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
NFL
Does the 16 game rushing record have an asterisk?
-
- Posts: 38225
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:06 pm
- Location: All things must pass. With six you get eggroll. No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
- Contact:
NFL
I was curious who was tracking for the #1 overall pick. Seems like half the league is down there. Usually it’s two or three teams. There are 4 teams at the bottom at 3-13 and 5 teams right ahead of them at 4-12.
-
- Posts: 14274
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:45 pm
- Location: Phil Kessel's name is on the Stanley Cup. Thrice.
NFL
Yeah, could be 9 teams that finish with 3 or 4 wins. Imagine going under .250 and you don’t pick till #9 in the draft? That’s failing at failing or something. Definitely something the Jets would do.
-
- Posts: 38225
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:06 pm
- Location: All things must pass. With six you get eggroll. No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
- Contact:
NFL
Oh, wow. Just looked and none of them play each other this week either. 

-
- Posts: 53311
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: A moron or a fascist...but not both.
NFL
It does seem like there is a larger gap than usual between the good and bad teams this year. The wild card races have not really been too exciting this year, and with KC resting all starters next week, the AFC is probably locked up too.
NFL
Atlanta gets the ball to, what, their own 45 or so with 32 seconds left and 2 timeouts. By the time they throw the next incomplete pass, 20 seconds have run off the clock leaving 12 seconds left and 2 timeouts. Coaches should be fired on the spot when these things happen.
-
- Posts: 21562
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 7:33 pm
- Location: Iodine State
NFL
NFC North is wild, too. Imagine being a 12 or 13 win team and not get a home playoff game.
NFL
Group of friends just talked about this last night. General consensus was that minus, what, 7 or 8? QBs starting in the league week to week, they are butt. And with the shift away from focus on the running game that's been happing for a couple decades, now you have teams that just aren't really fun to watch because they aren't built to win. The best athletes are almost all on the defense side now, and you have a generation of 'creative' offensive coordinators that don't have the tools to make their visions operational. The good teams do, the bad teams don't but don't admit they don't...so the good get better and the bad get worse.shafnutz05 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 8:37 am It does seem like there is a larger gap than usual between the good and bad teams this year. The wild card races have not really been too exciting this year, and with KC resting all starters next week, the AFC is probably locked up too.
NFL
Meh. I'm a big Saquon fan, but I'm not sure this record is all that important, especially given the 17 game schedule.MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 11:58 pm Saquon only needs 100 yards to break the rushing record and the Eagles play the Giants next Sunday. If they rest him they should be disbanded as a franchise
Having said that, through 16 games Barkley has carried the ball 34 less times than Dickerson did in '84, and has a higher YPC with 5.8 compared to 5.5. If you take Dickerson's last game of the season out, he still rushed for 2,007 yards...2 more yards than Saquon through 16 games. OJ in '73 had 332 carries and averaged 6 YPC in an era where every defense was built to stop the run. That is...impressive.
If Barkley needed like 20 yards for the record, I'd say go for it. Put him in on the first possession and let him go get it. If he managed to maintain his average YPC of 5.8, he's looking at 18 carries to get the record. That's a lot of work in a game at the end of a season...and as others have said 18 or more opportunities to twist an ankle or ding a knee.
-
- Posts: 38225
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:06 pm
- Location: All things must pass. With six you get eggroll. No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
- Contact:
NFL
The record is the record. Asterisks or not.
That said, when you compare players from different eras, you can’t rely solely on stats as the game changes over time. You have to also consider the context around the game. Number of games in a season is one of those factors you have to consider, but there are many many more.
That said, when you compare players from different eras, you can’t rely solely on stats as the game changes over time. You have to also consider the context around the game. Number of games in a season is one of those factors you have to consider, but there are many many more.