Concussion probablyWut. Does that mean he got hurt in warm-ups? It's not like you're a game time decision testing things out and realize you have a high ankle sprain or something. Weird
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
I don't remember Adam Oates playing dirty. What did he do? Just curious. All I can remember about him is that he would never shoot. He was a pass all the time guy.You can add Brendan Witt, Adam Oates, Chris Simon, Dale Hunter, Craig Berube and Joe Juneau to the list of dirty Crapitals.
-
- Posts: 30563
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
That’s a boarding call. It should have been a minor, but Tinordi going in so awkwardly and being visibly in distress elevates it to a major and a game. IMO.
-
- Posts: 18124
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:35 pm
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
The guy he hit had the puck... up until 1/4 second before he hit him. Not even 1 full stride post release.He took four strides at 1.5x speed to make the hit. It was glaring when I watched a video of the replay
Skating to catch a guy with the puck and hitting him is not charging.
That hit happens 30x a game. Not tanevs fault Tinordi is a big oaf who trips over his own two feet. Probably why he's been riding a bus for 10 years.
-
- Posts: 19041
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:37 pm
- Location: people notice my car when its shined up
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
boarding call...because he was vulnerable? i don't get it.That’s a boarding call. It should have been a minor, but Tinordi going in so awkwardly and being visibly in distress elevates it to a major and a game. IMO.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
from the rule describing boarding:
"However, there is a responsibility on the player with the puck to avoid placing himself in a dangerous and vulnerable position."
"However, there is a responsibility on the player with the puck to avoid placing himself in a dangerous and vulnerable position."
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
Caufield summed it up last night post game imo.. you don't expect a guy that much bigger than you to fold that easily and fly six feet.
-
- Posts: 60900
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
- Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
He a dodint.
-
- Posts: 19430
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:02 pm
- Location: Monroeville, PA
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
I'm all for safety and such, but there was not a damn thing wrong with that hit.
-
- Posts: 42569
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
MIMH is taking the NHL video game version of the penalty and replacing the actual use and interpretation of the rule with it...Epically bad take. Even the homer Boston announcers said it was a clean hit.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
So is Tanev automatically fined $200 (lol) and pending suspension?
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
boarding call...because he was vulnerable? i don't get it.That’s a boarding call. It should have been a minor, but Tinordi going in so awkwardly and being visibly in distress elevates it to a major and a game. IMO.
The official wording for boarding is
By letter of rule, this is boarding, but like... how many times is that actually called boarding?A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player who checks or pushes a defenseless opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to hit or impact the boards violently or
dangerously. The severity of the penalty, based upon the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.
This also implies if you level a dude in the middle of the ice and he slides into the boards, you should be assessed a boarding penalty, which doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
Yeah. Now do meows takeMIMH is taking the NHL video game version of the penalty and replacing the actual use and interpretation of the rule with it...Epically bad take. Even the homer Boston announcers said it was a clean hit.
-
- Posts: 30563
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
I don’t think vulnerability plays into it. You can be vulnerable anywhere on the rink. Tanev launched him into the boards.boarding call...because he was vulnerable? i don't get it.That’s a boarding call. It should have been a minor, but Tinordi going in so awkwardly and being visibly in distress elevates it to a major and a game. IMO.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
Since there isn't a stupid hockey questions thread, do all major penalties (besides fighting) come with game misconducts now?
-
- Posts: 29472
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
one thing I learned last night is that by the rulebook's definition, boarding and charging are both very, very vague. They depend heavily on precedence
you could argue, by the letter of the law, that anytime someone checks someone else into the boards (as long as it qualifies as "violent") that it is boarding
you could argue, by the letter of the law, that anytime someone checks someone else into the boards (as long as it qualifies as "violent") that it is boarding
-
- Posts: 30563
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
There are two guys on the ice to interpret rule book and apply it based on the temperature of the game.one thing I learned last night is that by the rulebook's definition, boarding and charging are both very, very vague. They depend heavily on precedence
you could argue, by the letter of the law, that anytime someone checks someone else into the boards (as long as it qualifies as "violent") that it is boarding
-
- Posts: 29472
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
and we all know how well that turned out yesterday...
-
- Posts: 60900
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
- Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
meow just agrees with it because they take the temperature anally.
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
This is making more sense now
-
- Posts: 29472
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
losing both Geno and Tanev mid-game was really bad. We had more fourth liners in our forward group than non-fourth liners toward the end
-
- Posts: 30563
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
Judge all you want. I am comfortable in my own skin...and anus...
-
- Posts: 19041
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:37 pm
- Location: people notice my car when its shined up
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
it wasn't a text book penalty, but i'm not averse to penalizing hits like that because they always end ugly. i actually think the wrong guy is gonna get lit up on one of these and we see a push to change the rule book to not being able to hit a guy as he's in the middle of that kind of follow through in that spot or something.
because it's just one of those icky kinds of plays.
...but i still think they blew the call - given current rulebook
because it's just one of those icky kinds of plays.
...but i still think they blew the call - given current rulebook
-
- Posts: 42569
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
The entire rulebook is vague, bud...boarding, charging, roughing, slashing, cross checking...they all exist as varying degrees and it all must be considered at live speed...hell, even high sticking is not automatic...that's why they have trained judges on the ice to decide...one thing I learned last night is that by the rulebook's definition, boarding and charging are both very, very vague. They depend heavily on precedence
you could argue, by the letter of the law, that anytime someone checks someone else into the boards (as long as it qualifies as "violent") that it is boarding
-
- Posts: 42569
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
OFFICIAL GDT Game 29: Pens vs Bruins
It's not a dumb question. There are tables in the rulebook that answer this question indirectly...like, boarding and charging are not automatic game misconducts. If there's an injury to the head or face, then it becomes a game misconduct situation...but if you board a player so hard, but he's a slinky, and he lives, you can be assessed a major and leave the penalty box after five minutes and continue to play...Since there isn't a stupid hockey questions thread, do all major penalties (besides fighting) come with game misconducts now?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests