16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Home for all fantasy sports talk.
MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 30546
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by MalkinIsMyHomeboy »

Siemian is better than Palmer bro
Beveridge
Posts: 5487
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:17 pm
Location: 8-8-1

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Beveridge »

RIP to teams riding Gronk.
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

Heh, gonna be tough to make up those 25 catches through 12 weeks... ;)
MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 30546
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by MalkinIsMyHomeboy »

MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote:Siemian is better than Palmer bro
never mind, Siemian isn't likely to play
Pavel Bure
Posts: 7885
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:57 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Pavel Bure »

On the topic of Gronk I think his injury history now takes him out of the discussion as a first round selection in coming years. He's moving towards late 2nd round early 3rd instead of late 1st early 2nd.

If healthy he gives a team an incredible position advantage but is it worth the risk? The Patriots no longer try to involve a non-Gronk TE game to game as a focus. Even though Bennet is more than capable.

You take the Redskins for example and Jordan Reed has his own injury risks but you know when he's healthy he's elite and if he's injured Vernon Davis is still going to be a target monster in the #1 TE role. That's not the case with the Pats.

Next year I'd rank Reed as TE1 but you have to handcuff with Davis. Followed by Olsen, Gronk, Walker and then the rest.
mac5155
Posts: 14453
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:47 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mac5155 »

MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote:
MalkinIsMyHomeboy wrote:Siemian is better than Palmer bro
never mind, Siemian isn't likely to play
Should have went Flacco. I lost any way.
LITT
Posts: 7268
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:43 pm
Location: Those who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people with nothing to say

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by LITT »

Pavel Bure wrote:On the topic of Gronk I think his injury history now takes him out of the discussion as a first round selection in coming years. He's moving towards late 2nd round early 3rd instead of late 1st early 2nd.

If healthy he gives a team an incredible position advantage but is it worth the risk? The Patriots no longer try to involve a non-Gronk TE game to game as a focus. Even though Bennet is more than capable.

You take the Redskins for example and Jordan Reed has his own injury risks but you know when he's healthy he's elite and if he's injured Vernon Davis is still going to be a target monster in the #1 TE role. That's not the case with the Pats.

Next year I'd rank Reed as TE1 but you have to handcuff with Davis. Followed by Olsen, Gronk, Walker and then the rest.
im not sure i put olsen that high. cam newton is somewhere between this season and last season; however, too much variability. especially with kelvin benjamin healthy since he will compete for redzone targets.

i think graham and eifert deserve to be in the discussion
Kraftster
Posts: 2073
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:22 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Kraftster »

New all-time low for me in fantasy sports. Missing the playoffs on season-long tiebreaker of total points for: 1241-1240.9. **** this.
Beveridge
Posts: 5487
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:17 pm
Location: 8-8-1

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Beveridge »

That might be the first story that tops my game that I lost from Rex Grossman during the "they are what we thought they were" game taking my win going into Monday night to a loss.
LITT
Posts: 7268
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:43 pm
Location: Those who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people with nothing to say

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by LITT »

Kraftster wrote:New all-time low for me in fantasy sports. Missing the playoffs on season-long tiebreaker of total points for: 1241-1240.9. **** this.
did you play a kicker week 1
Kraftster
Posts: 2073
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:22 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Kraftster »

LITT wrote:
Kraftster wrote:New all-time low for me in fantasy sports. Missing the playoffs on season-long tiebreaker of total points for: 1241-1240.9. **** this.
did you play a kicker week 1
:lol: :fist:
Pavel Bure
Posts: 7885
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:57 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Pavel Bure »

LITT wrote:
Pavel Bure wrote:On the topic of Gronk I think his injury history now takes him out of the discussion as a first round selection in coming years. He's moving towards late 2nd round early 3rd instead of late 1st early 2nd.

If healthy he gives a team an incredible position advantage but is it worth the risk? The Patriots no longer try to involve a non-Gronk TE game to game as a focus. Even though Bennet is more than capable.

You take the Redskins for example and Jordan Reed has his own injury risks but you know when he's healthy he's elite and if he's injured Vernon Davis is still going to be a target monster in the #1 TE role. That's not the case with the Pats.

Next year I'd rank Reed as TE1 but you have to handcuff with Davis. Followed by Olsen, Gronk, Walker and then the rest.
im not sure i put olsen that high. cam newton is somewhere between this season and last season; however, too much variability. especially with kelvin benjamin healthy since he will compete for redzone targets.

i think graham and eifert deserve to be in the discussion
I disagree on Graham and Eifert. Not consistent enough. Kelce is a guy I overlooked but again consistency. Olsen has been TE1 or close to it this entire season even with Benjamin there.
Craig
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:09 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Craig »

Olsen is number 1 if you take gronk away.
MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 30546
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by MalkinIsMyHomeboy »

daily reminder that I traded Kelce for Jerrick McKinnon

@mikey
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

haha "but the situation is so good"...so long, useless 80/1000 TE...
Troy Loney
Posts: 28617
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by Troy Loney »

McKinnon is really bad, he goes down immediately at contact.
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

He's in a good situation though...
MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 30546
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by MalkinIsMyHomeboy »

mikey wrote:He's in a good situation though...
SHUT UP I HATE YOU



no, McKinnon has been very frustrating. And it annoys me how they use him too. They keep throwing him between the tackles which is obviously not his bread and butter instead of putting him in space on the outside.

But still, the fact that they think Asiata is worthy of a roster spot is mind bottling
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

Asiago is the king of vulture TDs, right? If so, he's technically, probably more roster-able than McKinnon in most fantasy formats...even though he's not NFL caliber...
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

Just for kicks...Luck vs Houston or Palmer vs. Miami in a QB friendly league that rewards big plays.
MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 30546
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by MalkinIsMyHomeboy »

Scored 48 points after projected to score 120


Life is pain
dodint
Posts: 60770
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by dodint »

I scored more than that just with Bell.
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

Yeah, looked like a rough week for a lot of teams out there...I might be the only team in my main league to get over 100 this week...I already have over 150 with Odell Beckham still to go...this will open up a 3-game lead between me and second place to close out the regular season...

Notably absent from my team: Jerrick MacKinnon...
MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 30546
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by MalkinIsMyHomeboy »

mikey wrote:Yeah, looked like a rough week for a lot of teams out there...I might be the only team in my main league to get over 100 this week...I already have over 150 with Odell Beckham still to go...this will open up a 3-game lead between me and second place to close out the regular season...

Notably absent from my team: Jerrick MacKinnon...
Ah, have Christine Michael on your roster instead?
mikey
Posts: 43504
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

16-17 Fantasy Football Thread

Post by mikey »

Probably not. My roster isn't bad enough to have to rely on part-time and/or "situational" players...*hiss*
Post Reply