Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

nocera
Posts: 18987
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby nocera » Wed May 15, 2019 11:22 pm

The fact that four officials on the ice missed something so obvious is downright embarrassing. The fact that Toronto can’t call down to the ice and overturn their stupidity is even more embarrassing.

crusherstasiak
Posts: 7987
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 7:16 pm

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby crusherstasiak » Wed May 15, 2019 11:36 pm

this bothers me as if it were the penguins because i have a hard time engaging with something that is this incompetent. if they don't care why should i?

nocera
Posts: 18987
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby nocera » Wed May 15, 2019 11:46 pm

Not only that, but Meier got an assist on the goal.

Orlando Penguin
Posts: 5985
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 8:04 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby Orlando Penguin » Thu May 16, 2019 6:10 am

If the purpose of having any instant replay review is to get every call right, why do we have handfuls of plays that can’t be reviewed? Either go full-on or don’t have it at all. This wasn’t a judgment call like a penalty.

meow
Posts: 16776
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯™

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby meow » Thu May 16, 2019 7:29 am

I typically root for chaos, but boy howdy...

This is why I was against replay. Either have zero replay or go all in. This dipping your toe in stuff is for the birds. Just give the coaches a challenge flag and let them throw it for almost any reason

llipgh2
Posts: 3658
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:42 pm
Location: Looking into the Italian citizenship option...

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby llipgh2 » Thu May 16, 2019 7:43 am

Agree with OP and Meow.

shoeshine boy
Posts: 1683
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:53 pm

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby shoeshine boy » Thu May 16, 2019 8:14 am

The fact that four officials on the ice missed something so obvious is downright embarrassing. The fact that Toronto can’t call down to the ice and overturn their stupidity is even more embarrassing.
well, 4 officials aren't all watching the same spot. different officials have different areas of responsibility in this situation but yes, how this is missed I do not understand. no question the Blues got boned on this one.

Troy Loney
Posts: 16779
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby Troy Loney » Thu May 16, 2019 8:36 am

Just watched the replay.

Good job refs.

NAN
Posts: 5500
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:26 pm
Location: Bruins are winning the Cup

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby NAN » Thu May 16, 2019 8:57 am

Refs/NHL should be embarrassed.

Sharks are definitely taking advantage of the blown calls, and shouldn't have to apologize. This is all on the NHL/refs (all the blown calls).

MR25
Posts: 10515
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Gamehendge

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby MR25 » Thu May 16, 2019 9:12 am

At the rate refs are blowing calls, is there even going to be a group that can ref the Finals without a big question mark over their heads?

RonnieFranchise
Posts: 4703
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:45 pm
Location: Was joke.

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby RonnieFranchise » Thu May 16, 2019 9:14 am

So replay is allowed for an offside call on a player leaving the ice and having nothing to do with the play, but not on a hand pass leading to a game winning OT goal. In the Conference final.

Got it.

Agree this isn't on the Sharks but gotta say their benefitting from three calls (or non calls) now has me rooting against them.

nocera
Posts: 18987
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby nocera » Thu May 16, 2019 9:16 am

If the purpose of having any instant replay review is to get every call right, why do we have handfuls of plays that can’t be reviewed? Either go full-on or don’t have it at all. This wasn’t a judgment call like a penalty.
Every goal should be reviewed. Have someone in Toronto take the 20 seconds to quickly review, make sure it's good, then continue. There wouldn't be a delay unless the official spots something off. At which point, a full review should take place.

MR25
Posts: 10515
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Gamehendge

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby MR25 » Thu May 16, 2019 9:34 am

All goals are reviewable.

The issue is, hand passes currently aren't. Even if a replay shows it.

nocera
Posts: 18987
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby nocera » Thu May 16, 2019 9:42 am

Well that's also stupid. If we're out here enhancing footage to determine if the toe of a skate is a millimeter offside, we should also be able to review blatant **** like a hand pass.

mikey
Posts: 27117
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby mikey » Thu May 16, 2019 10:59 am

It all sounds easy until you have to write it into a rulebook...

nocera
Posts: 18987
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby nocera » Thu May 16, 2019 11:11 am

Okay new idea: make hand passes legal.

mikey
Posts: 27117
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby mikey » Thu May 16, 2019 11:15 am

It is legal in the defensive zone, but the trend is that that will go away in time...the wave is crashing against that notion...

I also don't support additional hand passing...you don't want to promote pucks and sticks and hands going up in the air...

nocera
Posts: 18987
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: Pittsburgh

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby nocera » Thu May 16, 2019 11:18 am

That was a joke. If everything is legal, there's no reason to review it.

shmenguin
Posts: 14905
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: people notice my car when its shined up

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby shmenguin » Thu May 16, 2019 11:54 am

It all sounds easy until you have to write it into a rulebook...
Coaches can challenge offsides and goalie interference. Sometimes writing it into a rulebook simply means adding another line item like “hand pass”

shafnutz05
Posts: 34486
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 7:27 pm
Location: 0 days PDT-sober

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby shafnutz05 » Thu May 16, 2019 12:28 pm

lol, they awarded Meier with an assist :face:

iamjs
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:24 pm
Location: "Who needs hockey anyways? Didn't the Steelers just win a Super Bowl?" - Franco Harris
Contact:

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby iamjs » Thu May 16, 2019 12:45 pm

The fact that four officials on the ice missed something so obvious is downright embarrassing. The fact that Toronto can’t call down to the ice and overturn their stupidity is even more embarrassing.
That is my problem with the whole thing. You might not be able to review something, but you have the tech to see that something is wrong and the response was "well it's technically can't be challenged." But you can see something is wrong. Have Toronto fix it. Or **** it, continue to look incompetent. :lol:

I was originally indifferent to this conference final, but the Sharks have been benefited a little too much from bad calls. I want them to make the Cup Final. I want it to go seven games. Let it go triple overtime and have an obvious Cup winning goal from Joe get called back because a player was considered offside while going to the bench. And for the icing on the cake, have the Bruins score the Cup winning goal on a play that a result of a hand pass in the offensive zone.

llipgh2
Posts: 3658
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:42 pm
Location: Looking into the Italian citizenship option...

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby llipgh2 » Thu May 16, 2019 1:00 pm

At the rate refs are blowing calls, is there even going to be a group that can ref the Finals without a big question mark over their heads?
There doesn't seem to have been as many controversial calls/non calls in the Eastern Conference games.

llipgh2
Posts: 3658
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:42 pm
Location: Looking into the Italian citizenship option...

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby llipgh2 » Thu May 16, 2019 1:01 pm

The fact that four officials on the ice missed something so obvious is downright embarrassing. The fact that Toronto can’t call down to the ice and overturn their stupidity is even more embarrassing.
That is my problem with the whole thing. You might not be able to review something, but you have the tech to see that something is wrong and the response was "well it's technically can't be challenged." But you can see something is wrong. Have Toronto fix it. Or **** it, continue to look incompetent. :lol:

I was originally indifferent to this conference final, but the Sharks have been benefited a little too much from bad calls. I want them to make the Cup Final. I want it to go seven games. Let it go triple overtime and have an obvious Cup winning goal from Joe get called back because a player was considered offside while going to the bench. And for the icing on the cake, have the Bruins score the Cup winning goal on a play that a result of a hand pass in the offensive zone.
After being awarded a 5 minute major for a 2 minute minor.

meow
Posts: 16776
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯™

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby meow » Thu May 16, 2019 1:33 pm

lol, they awarded Meier with an assist :face:
Hilarious

meow
Posts: 16776
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯™

Non-Penguins NHL Games 2018-19

Postby meow » Thu May 16, 2019 1:34 pm

At the rate refs are blowing calls, is there even going to be a group that can ref the Finals without a big question mark over their heads?
There doesn't seem to have been as many controversial calls/non calls in the Eastern Conference games.
#eastcoastbiased

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests