Sub 150? I too remember 5th grade.
I am 5'10" and have a fairly small frame. It is crazy to look at pics from a decade ago (I was about 209 at my heaviest). Almost unrecognizable.
Sub 150? I too remember 5th grade.
It is the literal **** worst. I will probably never do it again, although I wouldn't mind doing the actual run next year so I can say I did a legit 25k. Stupid me went curling the following night, where you need leg strength to push out 16x during the game. Took me after my fifth push to realize, "hey, you just ran 15+ miles yesterday in one setting. That's why you have nothing in your legs." Even four days later I was still feeling it, which I can't same the same when I did either of my halfs.Holy sht JS. I would rather pull out my own fingernails with pliers than run for almost three hours on a treadmill. I HATE treadmill running.
I did think about doing that, but I always like knowing where I am. What's weird is as long as I could see the seconds tick, I was good. Once I was in that 6-10 mile range, that's where it sucked the worst. It was like I was going nowhere. Even trying to mentally break it up into get to 8 miles then subtract that time from 15.5 like it was a countdown, it just didn't work. Once I got into double digit mileage, then it was like I was seeing a reachable goal. Only 5.5 miles, 5 miles, 4.5... you get the idea. Same concept and only a mile or two difference, but something with seeing a double digit that made it better I guess. Plus there was a lot of run/walk/run/walk on that back third of the run, so while it still sucked, the 30 seconds of walking every few minutes did help.I used to put a towel over the display so I couldn't look at it anymore.
split leg jump onto the side guards. Mastered that craft long ago. Which also goes back to the why I feel like this is unofficial. The official distance was 15.53 mi and my official record distance was 15.68 or 15.78, so I think there's enough overlap to accommodate for my drink time.How were you able to step off the treadmill without immediately losing your balance and faceplanting into something?
I tried to work out in the gym when we were underway. Never again.Had a nuke school instructor who trained for a marathon on a treadmill while deployed on a sub, hunched over the entire time or else his head would be rattling off the bulkhead.
I can think or nothing worse.
Thanks. That's only a portion of it. I'll see if I can grab a better pic in the AM.Nice medal collection!
You can turn that off in the MFP app, that's what I did with my garmin so I didn't get extra "steps" I'd have to go in and look for where to do it cause it's been so long.@tifosi77 will like this.
I bought my Garmin 935 and it counts steps. Not a thing I care about but it does it automatically so I don't really mess with it. The watch is small and light enough that I do wear it every day. It started sync'ing with MyFitnessPal and giving me exercise credit for steps.
The problem, as I see it, is I was going to take those steps in the natural course of my day anyway. So it's already part of my Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR). Those steps were already accounted for.
I simply disregard them in my calculations, but I thought of tif when I was getting credit for 'exercise' I was already doing. I know he's taken the position that cardio exercise doesn't offer a tangible benefit for weight loss in the CICO calculation.
Yup, I had this same issue. The best way to address this is to log into MFP (not on your phone, the actual website), and click the "Enable Negative Adjustments" button. That has completely cured that issue for me. Now on days that I log workouts (whether walks or runs), the calories awarded for steps are adjusted downwards accordingly.You can turn that off in the MFP app, that's what I did with my garmin so I didn't get extra "steps" I'd have to go in and look for where to do it cause it's been so long.tifosi77 will like this.
I bought my Garmin 935 and it counts steps. Not a thing I care about but it does it automatically so I don't really mess with it. The watch is small and light enough that I do wear it every day. It started sync'ing with MyFitnessPal and giving me exercise credit for steps.
The problem, as I see it, is I was going to take those steps in the natural course of my day anyway. So it's already part of my Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR). Those steps were already accounted for.
I simply disregard them in my calculations, but I thought of tif when I was getting credit for 'exercise' I was already doing. I know he's taken the position that cardio exercise doesn't offer a tangible benefit for weight loss in the CICO calculation.
Back in 2012 when I lost 150 pounds in 10 months, I did two things:Yeah, cardio for weight loss is silly.
I fully acknowledge that weight loss is almost entirely diet based. And then a regular cardio routine will accelerate those results you're already earning through good diet.It is not without use. It is just not anything like the panacea dodint makes it out to be. Building lean muscle mass is more effective.
I bet you also got really efficient at your walking stride/pedal stroke.
A combination of CICO, moderate cardio, and strength training is best.It is not without use. It is just not anything like the panacea dodint makes it out to be. Building lean muscle mass is more effective.
I bet you also got really efficient at your walking stride/pedal stroke.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 136 guests