Making a Murderer Thread
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:02 pm
No. Alive doesnt mean conscious. And stop being a dick.
A Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey Message Board
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=926
stop being a dick.
And even if he didnt, it's not like the world is any worse for it. The dude wasn't exactly splitting atoms on the weekends.
Yeah i dont know if drugs or whatever would have kept her downAside from being brain dead or in a coma, is there an alive state where being burned alive wouldn't wake you up?
You got personal i made it about a guy none of you or i give 2 shits aboutstop being a dick.And even if he didnt, it's not like the world is any worse for it. The dude wasn't exactly splitting atoms on the weekends.
i hate to break it to the good sheriff, but that happens in basically every single documentary in existence.Sheriff Robert Hermann went on record as saying he couldn’t call the documentary a documentary, and told The Wrap that he had finally watched the documentary due to the increased notoriety..."In several areas throughout the film, you can see where they cut the tape and manipulated things. One place real evident is one of the interviews with Steven Avery in episode 5 — if you watch one video, it jumps from 3:20 to 3:21, then to 3:17, then to 3:22 and then to 3:18.”
On Dec. 22, Hermann told HTR News that he can’t call “Making a Murderer” a documentary because “a documentary puts things in chronological order and tells the story as it is … I’ve heard things are skewed. They’ve taken things out of context and taken them out of the order in which they occurred, which can lead people to a different opinion or conclusion.”
i don't understand your issue. your opinion was objectively appalling. if you say something like that, then you should be prepared to be called out on it. what's the problem, exactly?You got personal i made it about a guy none of you or i give 2 **** aboutstop being a dick.And even if he didnt, it's not like the world is any worse for it. The dude wasn't exactly splitting atoms on the weekends.
I gotta side with shmenguin on this one.i don't understand your issue. your opinion was objectively appalling. if you say something like that, then you should be prepared to be called out on it. what's the problem, exactly?You got personal i made it about a guy none of you or i give 2 **** aboutstop being a dick.And even if he didnt, it's not like the world is any worse for it. The dude wasn't exactly splitting atoms on the weekends.
this is where i'm glad i live in an area not populated by a bunch of dimwitted hicks. not that camden county new jersey is perfect, but it more resembles modern civilization and has a significantly higher median IQ (from police to citizens) than the god forsaken inbred hell hole on this show.What if it were you this was happening to?
unless it's someone you cared about, of courseId rather the justice system fail than a killer be free
Not if they were a killerunless it's someone you cared about, of courseId rather the justice system fail than a killer be free
I really cannot get my head around this comment. Not locking away innocent people is practically one of the tenets of "America". I just can't believe anyone would think it's better for the country, for society and for us as individuals for an innocent person to be imprisoned for a crime they didn't commit, especially since that means the "real" killer is walking the street.Id rather the justice system fail than a killer be free
I think Colby is implying that Avery is guilty, and the manufactured evidence was to ensure conviction. Nothing to do with imprisoning innocent people.I really cannot get my head around this comment. Not locking away innocent people is practically one of the tenets of "America". I just can't believe anyone would think it's better for the country, for society and for us as individuals for an innocent person to be imprisoned for a crime they didn't commit, especially since that means the "real" killer is walking the street.Id rather the justice system fail than a killer be free
well yeah, because it doesn't make much sense. in one interpretation, when justice does fail, the killer does go free. so there's that.I really cannot get my head around this comment.Id rather the justice system fail than a killer be free
I would feel better about the whole thing if there was a way to also convict those pieces of **** in the police department that planted evidence
When you come right out and say that, even if he's innocent it's no great loss, it's easy to misconstrue your opinion.Troy is right with what he said.
And my priority 1 is locking up killers. Priority 2 is a fair system. Address the killer first and the corrpution second.
His opinion isn't being misconstrued. It's very clear. It's just that he's provided an additional, unrelated opinion on top of that.When you come right out and say that, even if he's innocent it's no great loss, it's easy to misconstrue your opinion.Troy is right with what he said.
And my priority 1 is locking up killers. Priority 2 is a fair system. Address the killer first and the corrpution second.
Edit: To add, it's easy to say it's justifiable for police to plant evidence, etc. to get a killer locked away. The rub comes in when the police think they have a guilty person and do everything they can do get them locked away, but they're wrong.
Which evidence wasn't weak?The non-planted evidence isnt weak, its just that all of it is circumstantial.