Grammar thread?

Jofa Guy
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:35 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby Jofa Guy » Thu Mar 26, 2015 4:57 pm

Seemed like a big kick at lgp, what do you guys think about adding it here?

Won't be offended if this gets ridicule and/or deleted.

It should of start here, irregardless :pop:

MalkinIsMyHomeboy
Posts: 29488
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: “MIMH is almost always correct” -ulf

Grammar thread?

Postby MalkinIsMyHomeboy » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:08 pm

does Jofa Guy have a crush on Craig?

Jofa Guy
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:35 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby Jofa Guy » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:12 pm

Lol, no I don't. I didn't see that he started the thread. Thanks for starting this off!

(Does*)
My first one is the incorrect usage of ellipses. Gear grinder.........:

Rylan
Posts: 1301
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:48 pm
Location: Behind a mask

Grammar thread?

Postby Rylan » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:17 pm

The grammar thread was originally in the Matt Murray thread in PR. One of the mods must have split it into its own thread.

Jofa Guy
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:35 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby Jofa Guy » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:19 pm

Gotcha, thanks for clearing it up.

MR25
Posts: 18587
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Gamehendge

Grammar thread?

Postby MR25 » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:24 pm

No, there was an actual grammar thread that start like 2 years ago for grammar questions.

Rylan
Posts: 1301
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:48 pm
Location: Behind a mask

Grammar thread?

Postby Rylan » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:42 pm

No, there was an actual grammar thread that start like 2 years ago for grammar questions.
Ok, cool story. But the current thread was from the Matt Murray thread.

MR25
Posts: 18587
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Gamehendge

Grammar thread?

Postby MR25 » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:44 pm

The one that was in NHR that got recently bumped?

Rylan
Posts: 1301
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:48 pm
Location: Behind a mask

Grammar thread?

Postby Rylan » Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:46 pm

Was from the Matt Murray thread yes. You can still see the thread topic title of Matt Murray in subsequent posts after the "original"

mikey
Posts: 42599
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

Grammar thread?

Postby mikey » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:01 am

Ok...

Powerpoint presentation...

Top bullet as a short list of information. "...when: Renewing a license, upgrading a license, transferring a license from another state or out of necessity due to changes in job requirements."

Bottom bullet references the top. "Note: The above [is/are] the minimum, federally-regulated conditions in which..."

I really want to think it's the singular "is" but because the "above" reference items in plurality...beyond the fact that I could just re-word this, what's the right answer to this, ya think...?

PFiDC
Posts: 9248
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:23 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby PFiDC » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:07 am

Seemed like a big kick at lgp, what do you guys think about adding it here?

Won't be offended if this gets ridicule and/or deleted.

It should of start here, irregardless :pop:
*ridiculed

Sarcastic
Posts: 1317
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 7:40 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby Sarcastic » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:13 am

I is happy we's be can ask quesions here. i want lern.

MR25
Posts: 18587
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Gamehendge

Grammar thread?

Postby MR25 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:44 am

Ok...

Powerpoint presentation...

Top bullet as a short list of information. "...when: Renewing a license, upgrading a license, transferring a license from another state or out of necessity due to changes in job requirements."

Bottom bullet references the top. "Note: The above [is/are] the minimum, federally-regulated conditions in which..."

I really want to think it's the singular "is" but because the "above" reference items in plurality...beyond the fact that I could just re-word this, what's the right answer to this, ya think...?
Is.

"The above" would be considered singular even though it's referring to a plural, I believe. The "is" would be referring to "the above", not the plural statements.

Had you said "The above statements", then you would say "are". But I'm fairly certain in this context, "is" is the proper word.

mikey
Posts: 42599
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

Grammar thread?

Postby mikey » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:48 am

That was my feeling as well...but it felt weird when I got to the word "conditions" towards the end of the thought...

meecrofilm
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:31 am
Location: Filly don't do rebounds

Grammar thread?

Postby meecrofilm » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:49 am

Yeah. And I believe it reads as: "The above [content]."

Oh, whoops, totally missed that conditions part. I think it would be "are" then.
Last edited by meecrofilm on Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Craig
Posts: 7020
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:09 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby Craig » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:51 am

I started no such thread.

mikey
Posts: 42599
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

Grammar thread?

Postby mikey » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:05 pm

Yeah, I think it's "are" now...because remove the adjectives. "The above are the conditions..." or "The above is the conditions..." or replace "the above" with all of the conditions themselves and it would be "are"...

meecrofilm
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:31 am
Location: Filly don't do rebounds

Grammar thread?

Postby meecrofilm » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:18 pm

Now I'm second-guessing myself again. It'd definitely be "the above conditions are," obviously. But when you re-arrange it, "conditions" becomes almost a modifier for "the above," instead of just being the subject, i.e. "The above conditions are," vs. "The above [content] is the conditions in which."

So now I think it may be "is" again :lol:

Let me put it this way: whichever one is actually correct, "are" sounds more natural in that case, even if it's not, so nobody is gonna know if that's what you go with.

MR25
Posts: 18587
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:58 pm
Location: Gamehendge

Grammar thread?

Postby MR25 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:25 pm

You could just re-word it to the "The above conditions" like meecro said and lose the headache of trying to figure it out :pop:

redwill
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:08 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Grammar thread?

Postby redwill » Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:25 pm

"Are."

You're not referring to the singular list, but rather to the multiple conditions in the list.

Sarcastic
Posts: 1317
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 7:40 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby Sarcastic » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:01 pm

I think is/are refers to the word "conditions", so you'll want to use "are". That's not even looking at the top bullet.

count2infinity
Posts: 35713
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:06 pm
Location: All things must pass. With six you get eggroll. No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
Contact:

Grammar thread?

Postby count2infinity » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:18 pm

"To who's attention should this be mailed?"
or
"To whose attention should this be mailed?"

meow
Posts: 30574
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you

Grammar thread?

Postby meow » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:19 pm

whose

count2infinity
Posts: 35713
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:06 pm
Location: All things must pass. With six you get eggroll. No matter how thin you slice it, it's still baloney.
Contact:

Grammar thread?

Postby count2infinity » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:21 pm

I went with "Should I address this to you or someone else on your team?" To avoid having to decide, but thank you meow. You were far more helpful on this one than the last question you answered for me.

MWB
Posts: 8204
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:04 pm

Grammar thread?

Postby MWB » Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:21 pm

Whose... possession. Who’s means who is.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dickie Dunn and 47 guests