Well, yeah. I'm now wondering what can be done, legally, if they find that this couple spent all of the money themselves.
I wonder how easily a "defrauding investors" charge can be made in a crowdsourcing fundraiser.
Well, yeah. I'm now wondering what can be done, legally, if they find that this couple spent all of the money themselves.
I think misrepresentation might be a way to go. Which type, not sure.Well, yeah. I'm now wondering what can be done, legally, if they find that this couple spent all of the money themselves.
I wonder how easily a "defrauding investors" charge can be made in a crowdsourcing fundraiser.
This was my thought. Nike is taking the route ESPN went down in putting story ahead of substance. Which is fine. They're a private company and entitled to do whatever, doesn't affect me at all.I’m surprised that Nike wanted an athlete that can’t hang at his sports highest level
Tif, you know you can't reason with people. Stop bringing logic into this...gosh...That said, it is worth noting that kneeling alongside his teammates during the anthem was actually suggested to him by a combat vet Green Beret as a non-offensive alternative to just sitting on the bench, as he did at the outset of his 'protest'.
Not that you're suggesting it (or are you), but I don't think he decided "hey, I'm having a shitawful season, I need something to get back into the spotlight" and started the protesting.Well said, tif.
My only issue with the CK thing is that he didn't start protesting until he was on his way into obscurity. He was already relegated to backup duty when he started sitting on the bench.
Let's face it, he "Michael Sam'ed" it.Not that you're suggesting it (or are you), but I don't think he decided "hey, I'm having a shitawful season, I need something to get back into the spotlight" and started the protesting.Well said, tif.
My only issue with the CK thing is that he didn't start protesting until he was on his way into obscurity. He was already relegated to backup duty when he started sitting on the bench.
Yes, good call.Let's face it, he "Michael Sam'ed" it.Not that you're suggesting it (or are you), but I don't think he decided "hey, I'm having a shitawful season, I need something to get back into the spotlight" and started the protesting.Well said, tif.
My only issue with the CK thing is that he didn't start protesting until he was on his way into obscurity. He was already relegated to backup duty when he started sitting on the bench.
Users browsing this forum: Defence21, skullman80 and 111 guests