Photography

Talk about anything non-hockey related.
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

Noice. I see like new D810s on Amazon going for around $900.

B&H has an 8+ quality one for $799.
meow
Posts: 31717
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you

Photography

Post by meow »

I need some recommendations for a camera. mrs meow wants to start taking photos of mini meow's hockey games. so it needs to be able to capture movement well and the lighting at rinks is wildly different. Maybe a lower-end rec and a higher-end rec would help us get started.
LITT
Posts: 7340
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:43 pm
Location: Those who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people with nothing to say

Photography

Post by LITT »

We have one of the smaller Sony alpha models and it’s great. Very portable. Easy to use. Don’t need to make a million settings. I also have a more advanced canon camera I almost never use any more because the Sony takes pretty similar photos with a significantly less amnt of effort
meow
Posts: 31717
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you

Photography

Post by meow »

size is a good point. she doesn’t want to lug around or hold-use something huge. Especially when there are multiple games per day a lot of the time
nocera
Posts: 44543
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: He/Him

Photography

Post by nocera »

For the body you’ll just need something with a decently high frame rate. 120fps would make your life very easy but that’s not really necessary if you can ‘git good.’ Really any mid-high end DLSR from the big brands would suit you fine. The lens would probably make the biggest difference. Look into a good 75-200mm (or 300mm) lens. I can get more specific later if you’d like. Really this is a question for @AuthorTony though.
Beveridge
Posts: 5576
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:17 pm
Location: 8-8-1

Photography

Post by Beveridge »

meow wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:28 am size is a good point. she doesn’t want to lug around or hold-use something huge. Especially when there are multiple games per day a lot of the time
Wait for it...
Ad@m
Posts: 5787
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:21 pm

Photography

Post by Ad@m »

Beveridge wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:36 am
meow wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:28 am size is a good point. she doesn’t want to lug around or hold-use something huge. Especially when there are multiple games per day a lot of the time
Wait for it...
:lol:
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

I’m still very much a DSLR guy, but my buddy swears by his Sony Alpha. You’ll pay up for it, though. I don’t believe there is a P&S that will be good enough to consider over something with a removable lense.
AuthorTony
Posts: 9192
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

Photography

Post by AuthorTony »

A DSLR or mirrorless camera with a 70-200 lens is going to blow away any point and shoot. But, as the saying goes, the best camera is the one in your hand. If she's going to be more apt to carry around and use a P&S then go that route. Sorry, but I have no experience with P&Ss and can't recommend any specific model. Look for something with a good zoom though, as she probably won't be very close to the action. I think some of the Nikon's have a crazy 28-300 range.
AuthorTony
Posts: 9192
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

Photography

Post by AuthorTony »

Some friends guilted me into photographing their daughter's wedding in May. I didn't feel comfortable with my D7000 as a second camera (never liked it) so I picked up a D800e with under 30K clicks, along with a battery grip. Less than $600 for both.
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

That's a great price just for the body alone.
AuthorTony
Posts: 9192
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

Photography

Post by AuthorTony »

I thought so too. I bought both from MPB.com. They have some great deals.
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

@AuthorTony: You taking shots of this eclipse? I don't have a "solar" filter, but was going to look into using my ND8 to capture it. Doesn't sound like that will be enough, though.
AuthorTony
Posts: 9192
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

Photography

Post by AuthorTony »

I have a 300mm prime so I was considering it, but I don't have a solar filter either. I think the highest I have is only ND2. Don't really want to fry my sensor. Maybe I should look for that D50 that's been hanging out somewhere in a closet for the last 10+ years, ha.
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

Yeah, I don't want to destroy my D750's sensor, either. Oh well, we should have planned better, haha.
tifosi77
Posts: 53005
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

Photography

Post by tifosi77 »

The........... totality path? crosses over Cleveland (which is appropriate), so western to central PA should get a good bit of sun-out, even into Jersey. Yonder west here I think we're supposed to have like 55%+ block. Yahoo.
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

It's going to be 89.3% for my area.
nocera
Posts: 44543
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: He/Him

Photography

Post by nocera »

Pittsburgh is is 97.2%. It's also insanely cloudy so I'm just expecting it to be a bit dark.
AuthorTony
Posts: 9192
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

Photography

Post by AuthorTony »

Very cloudy here today, so I didn't miss much by now having the proper filter. It was neat being outside and feeling the temp drop several degrees though.
Joegap
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 11:02 am

Photography

Post by Joegap »

I have always wanted to get into photography. Got a gift card from work - would this be something good for a noob to start out with?

https://www.amazon.com/Rebel-EF18-55mm- ... atf_m&th=1
nocera
Posts: 44543
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: He/Him

Photography

Post by nocera »

Rebel is Canon's "entry level" camera line and really great for beginners. That T7 was fairly recently replaced with a T8 but I don't know the differences between the two models. I'd recommend looking into that first. It might make more sense to go with the more recent T8 version. But yeah, it's fairly no-thrills since it's a low cost entry option, but you can get some nice images from it. I don't think it's 4k video, though. Actually, the T8 may have added 4k video... Not sure if that matters to you. It's definitely one of the more user-friendly DLSR options. Tony can probably go into way more detail but I think it's a solid starter option.
AuthorTony
Posts: 9192
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

Photography

Post by AuthorTony »

I have never so much as touched a Canon camera, so I can't speak to the specifics of that model. That said, any modern dslr is going to take perfectly fine photographs. It's also going to be heads and shoulders better than the cameras I used when starting my business. Technological advances n'at.

Two things to consider. Those lenses kit are pretty "slow." They'll be fine for taking outdoor pictures on a sunny day, but you're going to be hard pressed to get anything usable indoors with glass that slow. I'd pick up a "nifty 50" (50mm 1.8) lens too. You can usually get one for about $100. Doesn't need to be the latest and greatest. It'll give you a lot more flexibility in regards to low light situations.

Second, dslrs are now old tech, if that kind of thing matters to you. Mirrorless is the future of cameras. I don't get the hype for them, but every camera manufacturer is going in that direction, and there likely won't be much new glass made for dslrs. But, decades worth of great used glass will always remains available.
NTP66
Posts: 63153
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:00 pm
Location: FUCΚ! Even in the future nothing works.

Photography

Post by NTP66 »

IMO, go to a camera shop and check them out in person. For me, Nikon DSLRs just 'felt' better in my hands, and the menu is superior; Canon's is a mess.
eddy
Posts: 22655
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:49 am
Location: Emmet's barn loft

Photography

Post by eddy »

I have a Nikon d7100 and am trying to figure out if I should use the 51 point or 11 point for kids sports and bird pictures? Something happened to the camera over the weekend and I had to factory reset. That worked and I'm trying to figure out the shutter priority settings I had for sports/birds as well. Any tips you got?
Ad@m
Posts: 5787
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:21 pm

Photography

Post by Ad@m »

@AuthorTony
Post Reply