Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Nailed it.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
I believe De Palma's first reaction at the conclusion of of the film was "What is this s**t??" I've heard he had a similar reaction to Ep I, and his bristling caused a bit of a rift between the two - in 1999 Lucas did not need De Palma's advice any more, you see.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Those of us who saw Episode 1 would disagree.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
This is a great show but every time Lucas talks I'm reminded how old he is now. The last time I heard a long sit down with him was probably the 2015 Charlie Rose interview. He's 78 now and you can hear the age in his voice.I am 2.5 episodes in, and it is spectacular. Much of it is known legend, of course. But hearing all the primary players tell the story first hand is wonderful.
One bit of factual record correction (or erroneous memory on my part) that I appreciate: For years - pretty much my whole life - I thought Battlestar Galactica was a 'rogue' production that Dykstra did almost out of spite for getting canned from proto-ILM. I didn't realize it was filler material to keep that core crew from Star Wars working while Lucas got the early days of the Ep V project put together, and that it was only after that, when Lucas was moving the team to Marin, that Dykstra got ye boot.
Also I'm so happy that Phil Tippett is involved in this. I want a whole doc just about dinosaur supervisor Phil Tippett. What a career.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Finished Light & Magic and thoroughly enjoyed every episode. It's also funny hearing them talk about the Volume so lovingly. Of course they went overboard and overused it to the point where it hindered the look of some of the shows. They were so excited that it was possible that they just threw everything up in the Volume rather than determining the best way to accomplish each shot. I'm sure the cost was also much more appealing than shooting on location or building more of a physical set. I'm happy to see Andor moving in the other direction.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
StageCraft is going to change the way movies (filmed entertainment, generally) are made in the same way CGI first revolutionized the craft 30 years ago.
I disagree with the sense that the D+ shows feel 'small' because of StageCraft. All of the shows have been extremely scaled down character-driven dramas, as opposed to the operatic nature of the Saga and Story films; that necessarily means a more close-in vibe, regardless of the particulars of how it was shot. In terms of the mis- or overuse of StageCraft, there are a handful of scenes in Kenobi that were completely head-scratchy in their composition, but otherwise I don't really get what you're talking about. (It was all the more confounding because Chow directed two of the better Chapters in Mando Se1, and they were both pretty action-heavy)
In terms of 'determining the best way to accomplish each shot'; they're TV shows, StageCraft is the best way to accomplish a shot. (There are at least half a dozen shots in the Andor trailer that I'd love to know how they shot if they weren't using StageCraft; I remain somewhat dubious about the "we didn't use The Volume" claims.)
Look at a feature like The Batman: Something like 95% of the Penguin car chase was shot on a StageCraft volume, and almost every single skyline vista was the same. There isn't a problem with the tech.
I disagree with the sense that the D+ shows feel 'small' because of StageCraft. All of the shows have been extremely scaled down character-driven dramas, as opposed to the operatic nature of the Saga and Story films; that necessarily means a more close-in vibe, regardless of the particulars of how it was shot. In terms of the mis- or overuse of StageCraft, there are a handful of scenes in Kenobi that were completely head-scratchy in their composition, but otherwise I don't really get what you're talking about. (It was all the more confounding because Chow directed two of the better Chapters in Mando Se1, and they were both pretty action-heavy)
In terms of 'determining the best way to accomplish each shot'; they're TV shows, StageCraft is the best way to accomplish a shot. (There are at least half a dozen shots in the Andor trailer that I'd love to know how they shot if they weren't using StageCraft; I remain somewhat dubious about the "we didn't use The Volume" claims.)
Look at a feature like The Batman: Something like 95% of the Penguin car chase was shot on a StageCraft volume, and almost every single skyline vista was the same. There isn't a problem with the tech.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
There are full scenes in OB1 and Fett that have zero depth at all. There’s a scene in I think Kenobi where a person waves a gun at a Tie Fighter on a screen. (Man those shows are totally unmemorable). It looks like a more advanced rear projection. It’s not the tech that’s the problem, it’s the over-reliance and/or misuse. Much like green screen has its place but Lucas went way overboard with it while shooting 2 & 3.
The Volume works great for extending sets but it shouldn’t fully replace location shooting.
The Volume works great for extending sets but it shouldn’t fully replace location shooting.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Replacing location shooting is exactly why StageCraft is the future, especially for smaller budget stuff.
There are unique logistical challenges that the technology brings in (it front-loads work that normally wouldn't happen until months after shooting), but those challenges also bring opportunities that green screen never could. A single shot can have live-action, motion control, and stop motion elements all dynamically lit and seen by actors on set and all photographed by one camera at the same time
There will always be a place for location work. But StageCraft a tremendously liberating tool for filmmakers.
There are unique logistical challenges that the technology brings in (it front-loads work that normally wouldn't happen until months after shooting), but those challenges also bring opportunities that green screen never could. A single shot can have live-action, motion control, and stop motion elements all dynamically lit and seen by actors on set and all photographed by one camera at the same time
There will always be a place for location work. But StageCraft a tremendously liberating tool for filmmakers.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
I understand the possibilities and why it’s cool, but the way it has been utilized thus far creates flat, boring cinematography. The best approach is likely a combination of techniques rather than shooting the entire production in front of LED screens.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
One thing I do like is that two grown ass adults with a shared appreciation of the subject matter can have a nice back and forth on the subject from opposite POV and not get pissy about it. You dick.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Spoken like a man who knows he's wrong.
-
- Posts: 15363
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 3:13 pm
- Location: dodint is a millennial
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Here we go. Rebels absolutely nailed it with their characters, better so than most in the actual movies.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Ezra is the same age as Luke & Leia, so if dude man here is mid-20s to early-30s that would make him age-appropriate enough for the timeline of the show where he could be Young Ezra in flashbacks or Present Ezra.
-
- Posts: 12407
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:50 pm
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
If this Ezra character is not the spawn of, or parent of, someone else in the original trilogy, I am not interested
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
You should be, I'd say he's been one of the best characters in all of star wars. Much better than Luke imo
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
This is going to be another character that I don't appreciate because I don't know the cartoon's backstory, isn't it? And like Ahsoka, if you don't know the animated story, you ain't going to get anything from the live action version.
-
- Posts: 19680
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 7:33 pm
- Location: Iodine State
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
Sounds like you have some watching to do.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
I tried. It's not for me. I'm starting to realize the Disney+ shows aren't really for me either except Mando.
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
What? I didn't even offer any criticisms. I know the cartoons are beloved. I just can't get into them.
And, let's not act like any of the other D+ series have been home runs. I'm looking forward to Andor though.
And, let's not act like any of the other D+ series have been home runs. I'm looking forward to Andor though.
-
- Posts: 30451
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
Star Wars discussion (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
+1What? I didn't even offer any criticisms. I know the cartoons are beloved. I just can't get into them.
And, let's not act like any of the other D+ series have been home runs. I'm looking forward to Andor though.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Dickie Dunn and 105 guests