Movie Thread
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2020 6:19 pm
‘I want to **** yinz like an animalll’ still works.
A Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey Message Board
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=27
Haha, my 9 year old yelled this same thing out when that scene popped upFound this gem on r/ShittyMovieDetails:
In Wonder Woman 1984 (2020), Diana Prince (Gal Godot) tells Max Lord (Pedro Pascal) that she doesn't own a TV. Later in the film, it is revealed that Diana in fact owns many TVs. This is an ironic twist because, despite carrying the Lasso of Truth, Wonder Woman is a **** liar.
I am very confused. The main characters were black. This is like saying Downton Abbey is unapologetically white.It was just a weird way to hear a movie described. I really enjoy cultural stuff like that (hence why I liked Coco as much as I did), and I think that kind of stuff is great for the kids too. I thought the term was weird for the exact reason you mentioned. Since when does a movie (or any piece of art, for that matter) have to apologize for that?Would it make you feel better if it was apologetic about its blackness?
I know everyone here is trying to make this a gotcha thing, I just thought it was a strange way to describe a Pixar movie.
What an astounding rabbit hole of stupid. Some absolute moron at Salon.com wrote about how Downton is about rich conservative people. Imagine what an absolute baby-brain you'd have to be, to be watching Downton, and think it's some kind of profound insight to notice that the freaking English landed gentry characters are conservative, and how can liberals like a show that espouses conservative opinions. And so the insider story is asking the director about the "criticism", who handled the question about as politely dismissive as imaginable in that scenario.For the score keepers, here is an article with the director of Downton Abby discussing whether he should have to apologize for it being unapolegitically white: https://www.insider.com/downton-abbey-w ... ple-2019-9
I don't understand why a descriptor of "bold" needs given we've had several Disney and Pixar movies that were mostly black and there have been hundreds of movies and television shows that fit that description.
I agree that it is a reasonable question to ask, my issue is with the take. The movie is about one's purpose in life, centered around a black jazz musician, if you're take from a movie with a black character is that it's "unapologetically black", you're either genuine dumb person, or paid to generate hate reads, like the people paid to call Downton Abbey too white.I can understand where shaf is coming from. If Soul is a good story that has mostly black characters then it is an experience that is different than a movie that features a story about being black. The latter would resonate a lot less in a white household like shaf's, just by its nature.
In the same way that a story with gay characters is more enjoyable than a story about characters being gay where that is their only personality trait and plot driver when most of the audience is not-gay.
I am excited as hell for this. I love every single one of those movies, including 3 and 4. Bring back Leo Getz and all will be good.Oh man
I appreciate both of these responses. My wife and I have actually tried really hard to expose our daughter to works from different cultural backgrounds, because growing up in rural Lancaster County, she obviously is not going to have much exposure to that in her social circles (with the exception of her two best friends across the street, who are mixed-race). I'm happy Pixar has done more of that lately, and done it in a way that isn't hamfisted.I agree that it is a reasonable question to ask, my issue is with the take. The movie is about one's purpose in life, centered around a black jazz musician, if you're take from a movie with a black character is that it's "unapologetically black", you're either genuine dumb person, or paid to generate hate reads, like the people paid to call Downton Abbey too white.I can understand where shaf is coming from. If Soul is a good story that has mostly black characters then it is an experience that is different than a movie that features a story about being black. The latter would resonate a lot less in a white household like shaf's, just by its nature.
In the same way that a story with gay characters is more enjoyable than a story about characters being gay where that is their only personality trait and plot driver when most of the audience is not-gay.
Oh man no