Politics And Current Events
Posted: Thu May 19, 2022 2:49 pm
I've had a few molitov cocktails thrown through my windows.NAN, is this thread the extent of lefties being mean to you?
A Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey Message Board
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=19
I've had a few molitov cocktails thrown through my windows.NAN, is this thread the extent of lefties being mean to you?
That's mean.And yet, you still haven't gotten the message.
Shenanigans! Everyone knows you throw Molotovs at the exterior structure, where they can't be extinguished without the occupants of the house going outside where the peril is located.I've had a few molitov cocktails thrown through my windows.NAN, is this thread the extent of lefties being mean to you?
I'll be by again tonight NAN but don't bother staying up too late.I've had a few molitov cocktails thrown through my windows.NAN, is this thread the extent of lefties being mean to you?
Always knew you were antifaI'll be by again tonight NAN but don't bother staying up too late.I've had a few molitov cocktails thrown through my windows.NAN, is this thread the extent of lefties being mean to you?
There is a lot of 'how can anyone not agree with us?!?' and 'how can anyone side with them?!?' in this thread. I come in and try to offer a perspective that really is from the middle (believe it or not) about why some people really don't side with Democrats on issues that are, for Democrats, no brainers. I attempt to give y'all an example of how it's viewed from the middle, give you a real world example of how the toxicity from the left can frustrate and even anger Independents or Moderates (namely calling people who disagree with them racists when they're not). I point out that the toxicity poisons the entire political landscape, and also point out that the right does the same poop......... and it's called posting a wall of partisan rhetoric.Claiming to be “independent” and posting a wall of partisan rhetoric doesn’t jive Geno.
Edited to include complete wall of partisan rhetoric.The left wants a somewhat open border policy, amnesty for immigrants that came here illegally, and voting rights extended to them. They establish this argument as a principled view, not a political view, then attack detractors calling them racist, xenophobic, isolationists, white nationalists, etc. But that's all malarkey...their views on the issue are 100% (or at least 99%) political in nature, not principled. They aren't pushing for amnesty and voting rights based on some principled moral high ground...they want it because 80% of the millions of people in that amnesty group vote democrat and would likely flip Texas and Arizona (at least) blue. They'll twist it, saying things like 'We want this cause it's the right thing to do, and if they vote Democrat that's just a bonus'. But here's the rub...if that demographic voted 80% republican, is there anyone on the left that would support a republican administration granting amnesty or voting rights?
Pure insanity.cool
Maybe he is referring to the "dreamers?"Is this supposed to be a fact?
You make a good argument, actually.Oh, yeah, sure, just what the world needs, more Oklahomans.
Dreamers? Now, no, but if they become citizens I think they would be able to. Asylum seekers, no, unless they become citizens eventually.Can they vote?
I like how you used two sentences to say the same thing lolDreamers? Now, no, but if they become citizens I think they would be able to. Asylum seekers, no, unless they become citizens eventually.Can they vote?
Why not just ban birth control?cool
A bill making its way through the Oklahoma Legislature would require parents' OK on contraception for minorsWhy not just ban birth control?cool
Let’s be realistic and just make it so that conception starts with just the tip.Why not just ban birth control?cool