Fifth Avenue Forum

Disgraceful is what Kavanugh is alleged to have done.

Democrats, not knowing how to handle such an old allegation, is not disgraceful. It's perplexing, but I still don't know the right thing to do here.

I'd say it's on the Trump WH to do the right think and pull the nomination. But of course Trump is behind closed doors fuming about how old allegations can ruin people.

Is it more disgraceful than the act itself?

Disgraceful is what Kavanugh is alleged to have done.

Democrats, not knowing how to handle such an old allegation, is not disgraceful. It's perplexing, but I still don't know the right thing to do here.

I'd say it's on the Trump WH to do the right think and pull the nomination. But of course Trump is behind closed doors fuming about how old allegations can ruin people.

Oh **** off. The democrats knew exactly what they were doing. To say or think otherwise is being intellectually dishonest.

Disgraceful is what Kavanugh is alleged to have done.

Democrats, not knowing how to handle such an old allegation, is not disgraceful. It's perplexing, but I still don't know the right thing to do here.

I'd say it's on the Trump WH to do the right think and pull the nomination. But of course Trump is behind closed doors fuming about how old allegations can ruin people.

"They should just nominate someone else. We'll be totally cool with the next choice, we swear."

Disgraceful is what Kavanugh is alleged to have done.

Democrats, not knowing how to handle such an old allegation, is not disgraceful. It's perplexing, but I still don't know the right thing to do here.

I'd say it's on the Trump WH to do the right think and pull the nomination. But of course Trump is behind closed doors fuming about how old allegations can ruin people.

Oh **** off. The democrats knew exactly what they were doing. To say or think otherwise is being intellectually dishonest.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... n-congress

Did you even read the account of what happened here?

Yep. But I’m smart enough to know.

Yep. But I’m smart enough to know.

Great point, you are so good at this.

Disgraceful is what Kavanugh is alleged to have done.

Democrats, not knowing how to handle such an old allegation, is not disgraceful. It's perplexing, but I still don't know the right thing to do here.

I'd say it's on the Trump WH to do the right think and pull the nomination. But of course Trump is behind closed doors fuming about how old allegations can ruin people.

"They should just nominate someone else. We'll be totally cool with the next choice, we swear."

Democrats are going to oppose every nomination on principle here.

So, it's Trump picking someone that is potentially unpalatable for 2 GOP senators.

"They should just nominate someone else. We'll be totally cool with the next choice, we swear."

Democrats are going to oppose every nomination on principle here.

So, it's Trump picking someone that is potentially unpalatable for 2 GOP senators.

You're right. Just on principle. Those darned principled democrats sticking to their principles and just standing up for whats right with zero political motive behind it whatsoever. It's not their fault Trump can't pick someone as virtuous and principled as the principled democrats.

"They should just nominate someone else. We'll be totally cool with the next choice, we swear."

Democrats are going to oppose every nomination on principle here.

So, it's Trump picking someone that is potentially unpalatable for 2 GOP senators.

You're right. Just on principle. Those darned principled democrats sticking to their principles and just standing up for whats right with zero political motive behind it whatsoever. It's not their fault Trump can't pick someone as virtuous and principled as the principled democrats.

"They should just nominate someone else. We'll be totally cool with the next choice, we swear."

Democrats are going to oppose every nomination on principle here.

So, it's Trump picking someone that is potentially unpalatable for 2 GOP senators.

You're right. Just on principle. Those darned principled democrats sticking to their principles and just standing up for whats right with zero political motive behind it whatsoever. It's not their fault Trump can't pick someone as virtuous and principled as the principled democrats.

It has nothing to do with Trump's pick, and everything to do with Mitch's handling of the Garland nomination...

One of the things that makes me giggle about Merrick Garland is he is awful on 4th Amendment issues. To the "right" of most of the GOP people on the court.

“I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity,” Kavanaugh said

Grassley says Feinstein's office is refusing to cooperate in setting up follow-up calls with Dr. Ford and Kavanaugh. "As a necessary step in evaluating these claims, I’ll continue working to set them up."

The democrats really **** themselves. If he withdraws the court will swing hard right with the next one. They realize they have until January to confirm a justice, don’t they? They’ll really fast track the next one.

The democrats really **** themselves. If he withdraws the court will swing hard right with the next one. They realize they have until January to confirm a justice, don’t they? They’ll really fast track the next one.

The new SCOTUS session starts in October.

Kavanaugh was on Romney's list. He has a perfect rating from the ABA.

We are talking about attempted rape here. Not high school philandering anymore.

Really think anyone with a conscience would think that crime is not important to bring up?

Kavanaugh is far more Roberts than Alito and is moderatr on abortion.

The Amy Barrett lady is faaaaaar more an abortion radical than Kavanaugh and she'll be up next.

But do you bring it up against the wishes of the woman who alleges it happened? I’m not sure what the right answer is to that.

The lady has already said she'd testify today if needed.

Also, Kavanaugh has lawyered up.

"They should just nominate someone else. We'll be totally cool with the next choice, we swear."

NEW: @WeDemandJustice, leading anti-Kavanaugh group on the left is planning a $700,000 TV/digital ad buy focused on the Blasey Ford allegations in AK/ME and for the first time since Kennedy's retirement is adding NV and CO to pressure Heller/Gardner

Yep. But I’m smart enough to know.

Great point, you are so good at this.

It wouldn’t have been difficult to tell people about the accusation while still protecting her anonymity early in his nomination.

“Hey guys, we received an unverified claim of sexual assault against Kavanaugh. Something you might want to consider before going thru with this.”