But, in hindsight, I wouldn't bother. It's boring. That spliced clip makes it look more confrontational than it actually was.Found it...I can't link twitter, but the reporter tweeted out that story with a link to the NBC news facebook page with the whole interview.
I'll take a look.
That’s quite a haymaker...Question asked about a hypothetical Obama asking for Romney’s son to be investigated and if it would have been okay for Obama to ask for corruption to be investigated. Schiff responded and the haymaker came when he said they hypothetical relies on an investigation actually happening which in the real life Trump example Trump said the investigation didn’t even need to happen and just needed to be announced. As a result it’s obvious Trump didn’t care at all about corruption.I'm not watching live... you'll have to be more specific.Schiff with a haymaker in that response
On follow up, it certainly wasn't confrontational until he called them all Schiff's shills. And even then, not all that confrontational.But, in hindsight, I wouldn't bother. It's boring. That spliced clip makes it look more confrontational than it actually was.Found it...I can't link twitter, but the reporter tweeted out that story with a link to the NBC news facebook page with the whole interview.
I'll take a look.
In case you missed this edit.
It's also just a worthless exercise, there's no need to expose GOP congressmen for lying, or making bad faith arguments. I mean, is there really one person out there aware of what this whole thing is about, that doesn't believe Trump held the aid to get Ukraine to provide dirt on Biden?
They don't believe that, they are somewhere on the "so what" to "lol, **** you libs" spectrum.It's also just a worthless exercise, there's no need to expose GOP congressmen for lying, or making bad faith arguments. I mean, is there really one person out there aware of what this whole thing is about, that doesn't believe Trump held the aid to get Ukraine to provide dirt on Biden?
nobody? NP?
When have I said he didn’t do that? I’ve made multiple comments on his impeachment is warranted but removal is not.It's also just a worthless exercise, there's no need to expose GOP congressmen for lying, or making bad faith arguments. I mean, is there really one person out there aware of what this whole thing is about, that doesn't believe Trump held the aid to get Ukraine to provide dirt on Biden?
nobody? NP?
Then just NP.When have I said he didn’t do that? I’ve made multiple comments on his impeachment is warranted but removal is not.It's also just a worthless exercise, there's no need to expose GOP congressmen for lying, or making bad faith arguments. I mean, is there really one person out there aware of what this whole thing is about, that doesn't believe Trump held the aid to get Ukraine to provide dirt on Biden?
nobody? NP?
Chiseler or fiddlin' benCan anyone even imagine a Romney child saying a bad word?
I got to the "so what" point after roughly the 200th threat to our very existence that called for immediate removal. Once Ukraine fails, you'll just move on to the next one with another new hero like Bolton ready to blow the lid off of everything. That damn broke yet, Troy?? So why the hell should anyone care at this point lol?They don't believe that, they are somewhere on the "so what" to "lol, **** you libs" spectrum.It's also just a worthless exercise, there's no need to expose GOP congressmen for lying, or making bad faith arguments. I mean, is there really one person out there aware of what this whole thing is about, that doesn't believe Trump held the aid to get Ukraine to provide dirt on Biden?
nobody? NP?
What a great precedent to set.Dershowitz argues that a president is immune if he views his reelection as in the public interest.
This.I know Kobe had a huge impact on the game and there are a ton of people who admire the man. I’ve also never been to an NBA game. Where’s the problem?
The rape charge was a joke
