Umm..the article said she got taken into custody but the bolded part you highlight says she is dead.http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/sol-pa ... id=UE07DHP
Massive Colorado Manhunt Over, Sol Pais Is Dead
She gone.
what is happeningA woman who was hiking in the area in the morning told CBS4 she was told to leave the area because “a naked woman matching the description with a gun was spotted in the area running through the woods.”
She is from Florida... what did you expect?Umm..the article said she got taken into custody but the bolded part you highlight says she is dead.http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/sol-pa ... id=UE07DHP
Massive Colorado Manhunt Over, Sol Pais Is Dead
She gone.what is happeningA woman who was hiking in the area in the morning told CBS4 she was told to leave the area because “a naked woman matching the description with a gun was spotted in the area running through the woods.”
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/l ... ources-saySol Pais found dead by suicide near base of Mt. Evans ending massive manhunt, sources say
*shrug*Late Wednesday morning authorities said Pais is dead.
This is the sheer absurdity of the suggestion. He's talking about releasing people he's been claiming are dyed-in-the-wool murders and thugs with no way to guarantee they stay within the bounds of said sanctuary cities.to go along with B, he's also putting a free ad out there for more to come in and get a free trip to Chicago or whereverSo this whole shipping detainees to sanctuary cities thing:
A) Democrats can say it's petty, and spiteful, but they can't be against it because they endlessly vouch for the well-being and goodness of the detainees. They can however demand increased funding to take care of the detainees, as they're now doing a portion of Homeland Security's job. Which in effect means Trump has to give them extra money after threatening them with pulling federal funds.
B) Trump's Administration is in a bad position, because he keeps saying there are rapists, thieves, ISIS members, etc in these groups. And he's now purposefully relocating them into areas that will make it harder to root them out and protect the country (if he's correct about the type of people coming). So the Law & Order President is actually making the country less safe just so he can be petty.
He calls these people rapists, murderers, and gang members. If he's talking about sending them to sanctuary cities, doesn't this already disqualify his failed national emergency take because he's ostensibly allowing them on US soil, and helping place them?This is the sheer absurdity of the suggestion. He's talking about releasing people he's been claiming are dyed-in-the-wool murders and thugs with no way to guarantee they stay within the bounds of said sanctuary cities.to go along with B, he's also putting a free ad out there for more to come in and get a free trip to Chicago or whereverSo this whole shipping detainees to sanctuary cities thing:
A) Democrats can say it's petty, and spiteful, but they can't be against it because they endlessly vouch for the well-being and goodness of the detainees. They can however demand increased funding to take care of the detainees, as they're now doing a portion of Homeland Security's job. Which in effect means Trump has to give them extra money after threatening them with pulling federal funds.
B) Trump's Administration is in a bad position, because he keeps saying there are rapists, thieves, ISIS members, etc in these groups. And he's now purposefully relocating them into areas that will make it harder to root them out and protect the country (if he's correct about the type of people coming). So the Law & Order President is actually making the country less safe just so he can be petty.
Even if he is just saying this for the sake of saying, it makes absolutely zero sense if you put more than a nanosecond of thought into it. It's not even clever enough to be petty.... which I guess makes sense if it's coming from Stephen Miller.
A group of doctors has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, pushing for new rules to prohibit the sale of raw poultry, pork and beef that contain traces of animal waste — something that is currently allowed under law.
USDA says it has a “zero tolerance” policy for fecal contamination in poultry and meat-processing plants, but this applies only if the fecal contamination is visible.
https://twitter.com/tvbrad/status/1118584386771931136“Car 2 Go” app “hacked” in Chicago. As many as 100 Mercedes / high-end cars missing / stolen. Many being used to commit crimes. > 12 people in custody so far. Per sources. Developing.
From that article:What you can't see won't hurt you:
Basically they're saying, "**** on your meat is no big deal as long as we cut it off and rinse it."“Visible fecal contamination is considered a food safety defect that can be removed by trimming” off the area of contamination and by cleaning the area with antibacterial chemicals.
USDA rolling back regulations on meat production is a good indication that it's time to go vegetarian.
CNN
@CNN
Follow @CNN
Beto O'Rourke is defending details from his released tax returns that shows how little he and his wife gave to charity, saying his public service is the real contribution https://cnn.it/2Isqk4K
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
