Politics And Current Events

Postby **willeyeam** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 1:49 pm

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say our guys have this handled

Postby **NTP66** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 1:50 pm

who the **** uses Bing maps

YouTube · Postby **mikey** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:01 pm

Balloongate!

Postby **Troy Loney** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:07 pm

Of note, the balloon is approx 80-120k feet in the air lololol

Cowboy Dans, favorite modest mouse song coming to life

Postby **dodint** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:08 pm

Might be able to hit it with a HIMARS. Montana Militia has those, right?

Postby **tifosi77** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:17 pm

Repeal the NFA!

Postby **shafnutz05** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:32 pm

Might be able to hit it with a HIMARS. Montana Militia has those, right?

No, they gave them all to Ukraine

Postby **robbiestoupe** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:52 pm

Get John Dutton to handle it

Postby **blackjack68** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:15 pm

After they fire straight up at the balloon, they should stand there and keep looking up.

Postby **Lemon Berry Lobster** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:27 pm

Seems like a job for the Space Force.

Postby **NTP66** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:39 pm

After they fire straight up at the balloon, they should stand there and keep looking up.

Postby **RonnieFranchise** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 5:15 pm

It's just a big ass flying lantern.

Postby **shafnutz05** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 5:15 pm

It passed over Kansas City earlier.

Postby **Gaucho** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 7:00 pm

Postby **faftorial** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 7:49 pm

It not as bad as this balloon:

Postby **faftorial** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 8:05 pm

So this Chinese balloon is 3x the size of a bus and has solar panels.

Postby **Shyster** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 9:06 pm

What is the basis for the 'historical analogical inquiry' in Bruen?

Are you asking where the SCTOUS came up with that test? I would imagine the same place they came up with strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational-basis review, i.e., they made it up.* The constitution doesn't say anything about specific standards of review, so it's always been up to the Court to determine what sort of standard of review would apply to the cases it hears.

* Specifically, the first time the SCOTUS mentioned the notion of differing levels of judicial scrutiny that would apply in different contexts was in Footnote 4 of United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).

Postby **meow** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 9:08 pm

After they fire straight up at the balloon, they should stand there and keep looking up.

baby meow was born on this day

Postby **shafnutz05** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 10:34 pm

Is there something more sinister to these balloons?

Postby **Beveridge** » Fri Feb 03, 2023 11:57 pm

I mean it runs on renewable energy, so yes.

Postby **tifosi77** » Sat Feb 04, 2023 12:12 am

It not as bad as this balloon:

INFORMATION

Postby **tifosi77** » Sat Feb 04, 2023 12:16 am

What is the basis for the 'historical analogical inquiry' in Bruen?

Are you asking where the SCTOUS came up with that test? I would imagine the same place they came up with strict scrutiny, intermediate scrutiny, and rational-basis review, i.e., they made it up.* The constitution doesn't say anything about specific standards of review, so it's always been up to the Court to determine what sort of standard of review would apply to the cases it hears.

* Specifically, the first time the SCOTUS mentioned the notion of differing levels of judicial scrutiny that would apply in different contexts was in Footnote 4 of United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).

Yeah, I was wondering if it was a "we made it up" situation.

Postby **Shyster** » Sat Feb 04, 2023 6:09 am

Postby **NTP66** » Sat Feb 04, 2023 6:17 am

I mean it runs on renewable energy, so yes.