I think the more people get exposed to Warren, the more people will dislike her.
Except the exact opposite is what's actually happening.
She looks and sounds like a really mean, Nurse Ratched-looking fraulein.
Just what this f*cked up nation of lunatics needs to keep them in line.
It will be very interesting to see how she appeals to the rust belt, because I think she is going to have the same hurdles (unlikable, elitist female candidate) that Hillary had.
She is neither unlikeable nor elitist. The only similar hurdle she will face is the misoginist hurdle.
Biden would be much better suited to winning back Ohio, Michigan, etc.
Because he's a man? He's a joke of a candidate who is only holding on in the polls because he's seen by the ignorant as the safe choice and because Obama.
Agree on point 2. The Indian thing is going to set some people off, but more than likely they were already going to vote for Trump.
On point 3, you're wearing Venezuela colored glasses.
You've got a year until the general, and when talking about wealth taxes to pay for green energy plans or MFA or college tuition, all the rust belt voters see is a decrease in their take home pay without a real benefit to them. Long term, that may be what those coveted rust-belt voters and their neighbors need but it's pretty obvious that they're not buying yet. So instead you look at Biden, who isn't trying to change anything dramatically, and won't be the drunk, embarrassing Uncle that Trump is spouting nonsense or conspiracy theories and trying to play tough guy.
He's the timeout candidate. He's going to play it conservative and is a known milquetoast politician. And knowing that the chances of the left taking control of the Senate are close to nil, a Warren presidency won't get anything accomplished except increasing animosity between the populace as she puts very left wing propositions on her agenda that the right will decry at the top of their lungs.