Politics And Current Events

Postby **count2infinity** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:21 pm

What I said is still true...

Postby **Gaucho** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:29 pm

Postby **AuthorTony** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:34 pm

Is that the Anitfa fist?

Postby **eddy** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:36 pm

So long human scum

Postby **Gaucho** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:43 pm

Postby **MR25** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:47 pm

Postby **count2infinity** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 4:54 pm

This is one of those, did it specifically stipulate those things or is that just what happens as a result of an overarching policy change of less regulations? My guess is that even Trump isn't mean spirited enough to make the policy change for those reasons, they're just a result.

YouTube · Postby **mikey** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:05 pm

Yeah...citation needed. I don't aspire for drama...

Postby **Gaucho** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:07 pm

I don't know what you two are arguing.

Postby **Viva la Ben** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:09 pm

All Trump did was restore religious freedom.

YouTube · Postby **mikey** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:09 pm

Not one person is arguing or presenting an argument...

But the question is: Did Trump really sign into law (or whatever) a piece of paper that said, "Homeless shelters have the right to turn away queer teenagers"...?

Or is someone trying to connect some wires about some general de-regulatory move...?

It just feels like one of those...

God is love; love is blind; Ray Charles is blind; Ray Charles is God kind of things...

Postby **Viva la Ben** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:11 pm

I mean you could read the article.

YouTube · Postby **mikey** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:12 pm

I honestly thought it was just a picture...I didn't think there was an even an article, looked like a screenshot...

Postby **Gaucho** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:16 pm

Not one person is arguing or presenting an argument...

But the question is: Did Trump really sign into law (or whatever) a piece of paper that said, "Homeless shelters have the right to turn away queer teenagers"...?

Or is someone trying to connect some wires about some general de-regulatory move...?

It just feels like one of those...

God is love; love is blind; Ray Charles is blind; Ray Charles is God kind of things...

i'm utterly perplexed by this post.

Postby **NTP66** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:17 pm

Biden can just roll that trash back, can he not?

Postby **eddy** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:19 pm

Not one person is arguing or presenting an argument...

But the question is: Did Trump really sign into law (or whatever) a piece of paper that said, "Homeless shelters have the right to turn away queer teenagers"...?

Or is someone trying to connect some wires about some general de-regulatory move...?

It just feels like one of those...

God is love; love is blind; Ray Charles is blind; Ray Charles is God kind of things...
i'm utterly perplexed by this post.

Just picture someone in a sharp pink shirt, classy jacket with designer pants and shoes, maybe a flashy$200 belt talking about licking dick holes and read it again

Postby **Shyster** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:27 pm

The issue is whether private, religious entities that contract with the government to provide social services can be forced to implement non-discrimination policies that may go against their religious beliefs. For example, in many places one of the entities that is licensed to provide adoption services is Catholic Charities. Catholic Charities doesn't want to place children with same-sex couples. Can the government force Catholic Charities to place children with same-sex couples or require Catholic Charities to place children with same-sex couples as a condition of licensure as an adoption agency? If a church runs a homeless shelter, can the government require that the shelter accept everyone, including people the church members would object to? Those are the questions.

Here, HHS issued a rule that said "no," although that rule may well be revoked by the new administration. There is also a case on this general subject pending before SCOTUS.

Postby **willeyeam** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:28 pm

We now have 5 living former Presidents. Is that the most ever?

Postby **blackjack68** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:28 pm

Somersetians are freaking out and saying how they'll never support Garth Brooks again.

Which is completely ridiculous. He’s sung for every President since Carter, excluding Reagan. Jill Biden reached out to him and he said he’d do it as a reach across politics even if he was the only Republican up there.

Postby **blackjack68** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:30 pm

We now have 5 living former Presidents. Is that the most ever?

Don’t think so, Trump had Carter, Bush 1, Bush 2, Clinton and Obama, right?

Postby **willeyeam** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:30 pm

Answer after googling, it is tied for the most with a few other times. Most recently before Bush Sr. died

Postby **willeyeam** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:30 pm

Ha, yeah

Postby **Freddy Rumsen** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:47 pm

Biden has already signed a plethora of executive orders that rolled back nearly all of that, including rejoining the Paris thing, and other stuff.

Postby **Gaucho** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:48 pm

YouTube · Postby **mikey** » Wed Jan 20, 2021 6:01 pm

All right, so if you're taking government money, I think you're subject to government rules...

If you're a private/religion entity, and you don't want to give kids to people who wear black shoes and brown shirts, then that's your business...