Politics And Current Events

[grunthy]

Two Tifstradamus jokes on one page. Good day, Tater.

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

[tifosi77]

They didn’t explicitly hire Fusion to get to Steele, yet they knew it was he and others that were gathering the information.

On what basis do you assert that the clients that hired Fusion GPS (initially the Washington Free Becon) had any knowledge as to the identity of the contractors they in turn were engaging?

[tifosi77]

Two Tifstradamus jokes on one page. Good day, Tater.

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

[Troy Loney]

Then of course, there's the difference between procuring a service and accepting an in-kind contribution.

[grunthy]

Two Tifstradamus jokes on one page. Good day, Tater.

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

[count2infinity]

Are we offended now?

[NailedPenguin]

Two Tifstradamus jokes on one page. Good day, Tater.

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

[tifosi77]

Two Tifstradamus jokes on one page. Good day, Tater.

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

[grunthy]

Two Tifstradamus jokes on one page. Good day, Tater.

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

[Trip McNeely]

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

Jesus, give it a rest man and use your time for something else. You are **** annoying

[tifosi77]

Didn’t take you long to make a joke about my understanding or reasoning skills, so... figured it was ok.

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

Yes.

Same two questions.

[grunthy]

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

Yes.

Same two questions.

Yes to both.

[MR25]

If I'm understanding correctly, is DJT Jr getting off free because he was too stupid to realize what he was doing?

[eddy]

[grunthy]

It wasn't a joke.

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

Jesus, give it a rest man and use your time for something else. You are **** annoying

He “attacked” (not very well though) my intelligence unprovoked. Don’t care what you have to say.

[Troy Loney]

If I'm understanding correctly, is DJT Jr getting off free because he was too stupid to realize what he was doing?

Aside from possibly lying to congress, it doesn't seem like DJT Jr would have any other criminal exposure. It is interesting to note that he is one of very few people who didn't cooperate with the Mueller investigation.

I'm also not sure what provable falsehoods DJT Jr provided to congress. Lying about telling his father about the meetings with the Russians or his knowledge of the Trump tower project? Maybe, but if all Mueller had on that was Cohen's word, then that's not a strong case.

[MWB]

Cool. I guess neither is mine anymore, because I trust that Larry the Cable Guy knows more about fixing people’s cable than you know about law.

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

Jesus, give it a rest man and use your time for something else. You are **** annoying

He “attacked” (not very well though) my intelligence unprovoked. Don’t care what you have to say.

Do you need a safe space?

Just figured I'd take this full circle, and maybe end it.

[dodint]

I say with all sincereity I wish I had tif's "knowledge" of the law.

[tifosi77]

To be clear, the 'attack' constituted me basically stating I didn't think you knew the assertions you were making were irrelevant and nonsensical, which implied that you didn't know what you were talking about beyond lame talking points. You still haven't clarified whether or not you understand what you were asserting.

[grunthy]

1) What evidence do you have that the clients had any knowledge as to the specific identities of the contractors Fusion GPS was hiring?

2) Do you know what 'work-for-hire' means?

Do you know what an attorney is?

Jesus, give it a rest man and use your time for something else. You are **** annoying

He “attacked” (not very well though) my intelligence unprovoked. Don’t care what you have to say.

Do you need a safe space?

Just figured I'd take this full circle, and maybe end it.

Nah. I’m good. This thread is my comic relief or safe space.

[Rigger]

https://www.ted.com/talks/cesar_hidalgo ... edcomshare

[Troy Loney]

Just got to the sharing of polling data. I find the wording very interesting. Basically, SCO is saying that because it was given to Russians, they have no idea what the data was used for, and basically allude to the fact that they can't assert the purpose of the transmittal. Interesting in that earlier in the report, they note that Manafort shared with Kilimnik their campaign strategy of targeting rust belt democrats. If i were to take a gander, I'd assume this data was given so that the IRA could target their influence operation consistent with the campaign strategy.

COLLUSION

[CBear3]

Just got to the sharing of polling data. I find the wording very interesting. Basically, SCO is saying that because it was given to Russians, they have no idea what the data was used for, and basically allude to the fact that they can't assert the purpose of the transmittal. Interesting in that earlier in the report, they note that Manafort shared with Kilimnik their campaign strategy of targeting rust belt democrats. If i were to take a gander, I'd assume this data was given so that the IRA could target their influence operation consistent with the campaign strategy.

COLLUSION

I think that's the assumed purpose since we found out it was shared. There was also targeted hacking of election officials which also may have been directed by the polling data.

[Viva la Ben]

More than 30 times Trump said “I do not recall” in response to the written questions submitted by Mueller. This from Mr “one of the great memories of all time”

[eddy]

I saw some reporting that the redacted report says there are 14 additional ongoing investigations that were sent out to other jurisdictions.

https://twitter.com/BySteveReilly/statu ... 4822159360