Thread of legal hubbub

slappybrown
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:19 pm
Location: Lifelong Alabama Football Fan

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby slappybrown » Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:37 pm

Thanks for the info and advice. Not in dire need of the money, it's more the principle of the matter and that they've been crappy to deal with since I've been there. Just want to be done with them.
No worries. Your best hook may be that they already blew the date and (1) have waived their right to any education and (2) are subject to any penalties in the statute because it was 32 days and not 30.

Good luck. I got in this same type of fight once upon a time in NYC.

dodint
Posts: 59384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby dodint » Sun Sep 03, 2017 11:20 pm

It's Obscenity and Pornography week in ConLaw. giggity.
Last edited by dodint on Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Shyster
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:08 pm
Location: Nullius in verba

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby Shyster » Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:52 pm

It's not going to be as exciting as one might think. And the upshot is basically that the Supreme Court got sick of hearing obscenity cases and pretty much decided to punt the whole mess in Miller v. California.

The 1979 book The Brethren, by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, details the inside working of the SCOTUS during the late 60s and early 70s, which is when the court was hearing a lot of obscenity cases. One of the funny anecdotes from the book was that once a month or so the court would have a "movie night" for the justices to watch the porno movies that were the subject of the cases being appealed. Justice Harlan was nearly blind in the last few years of his life, so one of the other justices would have to sit next to him and provide a running description of what was going on on the screen.
Last edited by Shyster on Wed Sep 06, 2017 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dodint
Posts: 59384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby dodint » Tue Sep 05, 2017 11:10 pm

Nice.

My prof is kind of a curious dude. This weeks lecture included a preface about what prurient meant; this included a description of what it means to turn you on, the physiological response including increased heart rate, gonadal response, etc. that may or may not be triggered by vibrators and other sex toys. The second lecture was about the distinction of using live children in child pornography and merely simulating children. The latter is technically not explicitly forbidden.

Both lectures are on Vimeo so I could link them if wanted.

Tittilating.
Last edited by dodint on Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tifosi77
Posts: 51629
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby tifosi77 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 1:45 pm

While the latter is 'not explicitly forbidden', you'd be inviting scrutiny if you were producing content that intimated underage participants. There's a whole thing in the anime/hentai world of drawn/rendered comics/games/visual novels/etc where authors create characters that are visually quite obviously meant to read as underage, but in the opening of the work they have a disclosure that 'all characters are over 18'. It's really kinda funny, in an arbitrarily gross kind of way.

It was around ten years ago that I interviewed with Playboy to be a '2257 compliance coordinator'. (Section of USC defining record keeping requirements for people who depict sexy time) Basically, the job would've been verifying model's ID documents, and establishing that they were at least 18. I didn't really put any thought into it when I applied, but after the interviews I was like, "Yeah, I don't really think I want to do this so much."





Edit: Really awkward typo.
Last edited by tifosi77 on Wed Sep 06, 2017 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Shyster
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:08 pm
Location: Nullius in verba

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby Shyster » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:11 pm

Bryan Garner will be doing his "Advanced Legal Writing & Editing" CLE seminar at the Omni William Penn on November 7. It's not cheap at roughly $800 for 5.5 hours of CLE, but I think this is one of the most useful programs out there. I drove to Cleveland to take it back in 2011, and I might go again now that it's in Pittsburgh.

http://www.lawprose.org/wordpress/wp-co ... l-2017.pdf

tifosi77
Posts: 51629
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby tifosi77 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:18 pm

From this paraphraser's perspective, legal writing is a sort of O-neg skill. Every professional can benefit from being better at it. (As the wonky construction of that last sentence proves)

blackjack68
Posts: 14867
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 7:09 pm
Location: Across the River from Filthydelphia.

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby blackjack68 » Wed Sep 06, 2017 9:02 pm

Let's get past this page so I can go back to reading this thread at work. All the pron talk kicked the work filters on.

dodint
Posts: 59384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby dodint » Wed Sep 06, 2017 9:04 pm

Yeah, even if the text is gone I'm not sure that bell we be unrung with the filters.

MWB
Posts: 8203
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:04 pm

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby MWB » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:09 am

Thanks for the info and advice. Not in dire need of the money, it's more the principle of the matter and that they've been crappy to deal with since I've been there. Just want to be done with them.
No worries. Your best hook may be that they already blew the date and (1) have waived their right to any education and (2) are subject to any penalties in the statute because it was 32 days and not 30.

Good luck. I got in this same type of fight once upon a time in NYC.
Update: They ignored my emails and calls about the timing of the notification and just sent me a check for 40% of my security deposit. Money was deducted for flooring replacement, "remove pet odor," shampoo carpet, replace light bulbs, and clean lint from dryer vent, among other things. I had the carpets professionally cleaned and deodorized and haven't had a pet there in a year and a half. I hate this place.

slappybrown
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:19 pm
Location: Lifelong Alabama Football Fan

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby slappybrown » Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:13 am

Thanks for the info and advice. Not in dire need of the money, it's more the principle of the matter and that they've been crappy to deal with since I've been there. Just want to be done with them.
No worries. Your best hook may be that they already blew the date and (1) have waived their right to any education and (2) are subject to any penalties in the statute because it was 32 days and not 30.

Good luck. I got in this same type of fight once upon a time in NYC.
Update: They ignored my emails and calls about the timing of the notification and just sent me a check for 40% of my security deposit. Money was deducted for flooring replacement, "remove pet odor," shampoo carpet, replace light bulbs, and clean lint from dryer vent, among other things. I had the carpets professionally cleaned and deodorized and haven't had a pet there in a year and a half. I hate this place.
Wow. Keep at it. I would tee it up like this: (1) they failed to comply with the statute and so the entire deposit is due and owing without consideration of these alleged damages and (2) even if that were not the case these deductions are absurd. Good luck.

MWB
Posts: 8203
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:04 pm

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby MWB » Sat Sep 16, 2017 11:12 am

Ha, yeah, that is the letter I just wrote. We'll see how they respond.

MWB
Posts: 8203
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:04 pm

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby MWB » Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:18 am

Their response to me was to ask for me to provide them with the pre move in inspection form that I filled out. I told them that they should have a copy of it in the file since I sent it back to them. They said they didn’t, so there’s no evidence of anything being wrong with the place when I moved in. My response was that I would look for it (I’m not sure what happened to my copy, but wasn’t able to find it), but that I had several emails exchanged that referenced the report and that it didn’t really matter because they didn’t notify me when they were supposed to. Their response was, ok, we’ll be sending out a check for the rest of the deposit. I got the check yesterday. Mark one down for the little man.

slappybrown
Posts: 16580
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:19 pm
Location: Lifelong Alabama Football Fan

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby slappybrown » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:13 am

Great work man, glad to hear you got the full amount

columbia
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:23 am
Location: South Baldwin Yinzer Strokefest

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby columbia » Sat Sep 23, 2017 10:33 am

I paid an overdue speeding ticket from SC earlier on the week. In the meantime, the state mailed a notice that my license had been suspended there. I hope that I can make this go away with just a phone call - largely because I need to go to SC next weekend and don't want to end up up in some county jail.

tifosi77
Posts: 51629
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby tifosi77 » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:34 am

*high five*, well done MWB.

MWB
Posts: 8203
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:04 pm

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby MWB » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:47 pm

Thanks, but don’t think I deserve any well dones. I’m just annoyed that they must get away with this crap on a regular basis and people don’t usually fight back. Certainly happy with the outcome, but wish these types of places wouldn’t try to prey on people.

willeyeam
Posts: 39740
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: hodgepodge of nothingness

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby willeyeam » Sat Sep 23, 2017 10:59 pm

I paid an overdue speeding ticket from SC earlier on the week. In the meantime, the state mailed a notice that my license had been suspended there. I hope that I can make this go away with just a phone call - largely because I need to go to SC next weekend and don't want to end up up in some county jail.
This exact thing happened to my dad on a family vacation like fifteen years ago. We just moved so the license suspension was mailed to the old address and he didn't know. Asshats cuffed him in front of my mom and little bro and sister and sped away while my mom was trying to follow. Good times. So yeah, pay that :lol:

Shyster
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:08 pm
Location: Nullius in verba

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby Shyster » Thu Sep 28, 2017 8:47 pm

New batch of judicial nominations, including the nomination of Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett to the Fifth Circuit. If approved (and he should be) Don Willett would probably become the most libertarian-leaning judge on the Courts of Appeal. Above The Law is not exactly friendly to the Trump administration, but as the article notes, Trump's judicial nominations have been pretty darn good (from a conservative/libertarian perspective, at least).

https://abovethelaw.com/2017/09/a-surpr ... nees/?rf=1

dodint
Posts: 59384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby dodint » Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:18 pm

Conservative probably is more operative than libertarian-leaning here.

Shyster
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 6:08 pm
Location: Nullius in verba

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby Shyster » Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:08 pm

True for most of them. I'm not saying any of them are pure libertarians, but some of them like Don Willett are probably as close as one would get.

Trump Nominates Libertarian-Minded Texas Justice Don Willett to U.S. Appellate Court
http://reason.com/blog/2017/09/28/trump ... nded-texas

dodint
Posts: 59384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby dodint » Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:15 pm

Yeah, not complaining. Just looking at the context. Texas gunna Texas, son.

BigMck
Posts: 1292
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:09 pm
Location: At the mall watching Paul Blart.

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby BigMck » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:45 am

If I have taken Slinuminumrectis, now known to cause dragging knuckle syndrome, and was unaware that a Class Action Lawsuit was filed by some Attorney group from Boston, can I, as an individual, still sue the producer of the drug?

A) not aware of any lawsuit due to no awareness.

B) aware, but not going to join the lawsuit because the offer from the settlement is well below acceptability for my symptoms that I suffer from.

dodint
Posts: 59384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby dodint » Sat Oct 14, 2017 8:51 pm

Law school, still being weird, as this is a thing I just wrote with full sincerity: "As a result of the instant case the legislature would be encouraged to draft an exception to the rule allowing adult children of step-parents to engage in sexual activity with those step-parents without fear of prosecution from the government, if they so choose."

tifosi77
Posts: 51629
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

Thread of legal hubbub

Postby tifosi77 » Sun Oct 15, 2017 5:59 pm

Not that I've pondered this much, but I don't understand why some jurisdictions criminalize that.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], mikey, skullman80 and 141 guests