Thread of legal hubbub
-
- Posts: 8950
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am
Thread of legal hubbub
Would that be similar to the "Son of Sam" laws preventing criminals from profiting via book deals, paid interviews, etc?
Thread of legal hubbub
Many of the "Son of Sam" laws have in fact been struck down as unconstitutional, including the original. The US Supreme Court struck down N.Y. Exec. Law § 63 in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of NY State Crime Victims Bd., 502 US 105 (1991).
Thread of legal hubbub
Nice. I'm jealous. Had a couple exhilarating circuit court arguments last year. Really love appellate work.The Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted a petition for allowance of appeal in one of my appellate cases, so I'm headed to the Supreme Court for the third time. My client prevailed before the Commonwealth Court, and this is the first time I'll be representing the appellee at the Supreme Court.
Thread of legal hubbub
There's now a circuit split as to whether laws banning female public toplessness are constitutional, which could potentially set the case up for the Supreme Court:
https://reason.com/blog/2019/02/22/10th ... ns-nipples
https://reason.com/blog/2019/02/22/10th ... ns-nipples
Thread of legal hubbub
this is what i come to this thread for
-
- Posts: 8950
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am
Thread of legal hubbub
I'm all for banning man nipples in public. No one needs to see those. As for the ladies, they can be free as a bird.
-
- Posts: 29204
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: (=^_^=)
Thread of legal hubbub
What happens in cases like this where there’s a misapplication if the law? Can the accused sue the entity that punished them (aka a state law)?So Louisiana apparently has a law against "posting of criminal activity for notoriety and publicity," and a woman was arrested under that law for posting a video of a schoolyard fistfight. The police seem to have effed up because the statute says it applies only to "a person who is either a principal or accessory to a crime," but beyond that this law strikes me as having some serious First Amendment implications.
https://www.wtae.com/article/mom-placed ... a/26454706
https://law.justia.com/codes/louisiana/ ... -14-107.4/
What’s the usual outcome of those types of situations?
Thread of legal hubbub
There are state-law claims such as false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution that might apply. In addition, the misapplication of the law would potentially count as a civil-rights violation, so something like a § 1983 suit might be able to be filed. Whether those claims succeed often depends upon whether a legal doctrine called "qualified immunity" applies to the police officers in question. As the name indicates, if qualified immunity applies, then the plaintiff will not be able to recover anything. It's not that easy to win a lawsuit against the police, but it is possible.
Thread of legal hubbub
Recent episode of one of my favorite podcasts, posted here in Youtube format:
It's about a staggeringly bad judge in Michigan. Some highlights of her behavior:
She was sleeping with the detective who was the principle witness in a murder trial she was presiding over.
She refused, for 6 days, to recuse herself from presiding over her own divorce proceeding. She used the 6 days to to destroy evidence, including using her court computer to search for 'how to delete hotmail from iPhone" after ordering the court staff to help her destroy evidence of her infidelity.
The special master assigned to investigate her misconduct found so many instances of her lying under oath the statements were included as an appendix to the report so as not to make the report itself overly verbose. She admitted to the perjury with the excuse "I wasn't going to make it easy on their lawyers."
Here is a link to the report, does not include the above mentioned appendix however: http://jtc.courts.mi.gov/docs/FC99.mastersreport.pdf
The divorce bit made me in the car listening to it.
It's about a staggeringly bad judge in Michigan. Some highlights of her behavior:
She was sleeping with the detective who was the principle witness in a murder trial she was presiding over.
She refused, for 6 days, to recuse herself from presiding over her own divorce proceeding. She used the 6 days to to destroy evidence, including using her court computer to search for 'how to delete hotmail from iPhone" after ordering the court staff to help her destroy evidence of her infidelity.
The special master assigned to investigate her misconduct found so many instances of her lying under oath the statements were included as an appendix to the report so as not to make the report itself overly verbose. She admitted to the perjury with the excuse "I wasn't going to make it easy on their lawyers."
Here is a link to the report, does not include the above mentioned appendix however: http://jtc.courts.mi.gov/docs/FC99.mastersreport.pdf
The divorce bit made me in the car listening to it.
Thread of legal hubbub
That...... my god, that's.... holy hell.
-
- Posts: 29204
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: (=^_^=)
Thread of legal hubbub
"She refused, for 6 days, to recuse herself from presiding over her own divorce proceeding. "
how does that even happen? In asking that question I realize I have no idea how judges get assigned to cases
how does that even happen? In asking that question I realize I have no idea how judges get assigned to cases
Thread of legal hubbub
The judge above her contacted her when he saw the case on the docket but didn't formally order her to recuse herself because it was such an obvious duty he assumed she was going to do it. But she did not and the husband had to file for emergency relief.
Thread of legal hubbub
I guess the follow up question there is how in the world is that not an automatic thing? How can the mechanism even exist for someone to be named presiding judge in matter to which they are a named party in the first place? Like, how does it even get to be a decision point. lol
Thread of legal hubbub
The 53rd District Court located in Brighton, Michigan is a county court with only one judge. Since it was the proper venue he filed it there.
If you go to their website there are two judges listed. That's because Brennan is still technically a judge (and pulling her six-figure salary) but her case load has been taken away and she doesn't come to the courthouse.
edit: I don't know. They also have a Chief Judge, so, yeah.
If you go to their website there are two judges listed. That's because Brennan is still technically a judge (and pulling her six-figure salary) but her case load has been taken away and she doesn't come to the courthouse.
edit: I don't know. They also have a Chief Judge, so, yeah.
Thread of legal hubbub
Yeah, depending on the size of the district in question, a judicial district might only have one or two judges, and the way those judges divide up work can vary from district to district. One judge might take all of the criminal cases, and another take civil case, for example. Or incoming cases might just alternate back and forth so that judge A gets even docket numbers and judge B gets odd numbers. While in many places counties and judicial districts are coextensive, there are a number of districts in both Pennsylvania and West Virginia where one judge covers a district that includes multiple counties, so the judge might be in county A's courthouse on MWF and in country B's courthouse on T and H. If that judge has a conflict, then a judge from another district (often a semi-retired senior judge) will have to be appointed to preside over the case.
Thread of legal hubbub
Totally get it from a division of labor perspective. Totally do not get it from a the-one-judge-is-a-named-party-in-so-and-so-action-and-there-is-no-failsafe-that-automatically-reassigns-the-venue-or-whatever-other-mechanism-that-must-make-more-sense-than-allowing-a-judge-to-preside-over-their-own-divorce-for-a-week perspective.
Thread of legal hubbub
There are many, shall we say, antiquated and inefficient practices, especially in more rural judicial districts. There are plenty of courts where everything is still done on paper, for example, and no one but the filing clerk knows where anything is or where anything goes.
Thread of legal hubbub
Cop pulls over woman and decides to writes her a ticket for a lesser violation rather than speeding. Woman is not mollified by the reduction and flips off cop as she pulls away. Cop immediately pulls her over again and amends the ticket to a full speeding violation. Section 1983 violation of the woman's constitutional rights? You bet—and no qualified immunity—says a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in an opinion issued today: “Any reasonable officer would know that a citizen who raises her middle finger engages in speech protected by the First Amendment.” Upgrading the ticket was illegal retaliation for her expressive act, and the second stop was also illegal because the woman had not broken any law that would have justified another traffic stop.
http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinion ... 43p-06.pdf
http://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinion ... 43p-06.pdf
Thread of legal hubbub
Huh. Accountability. Sorta. Neat.
-
- Posts: 8950
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am
Thread of legal hubbub
Any of the folks who are much smarter than me care to chime in on this?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... court.html
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/201 ... court.html
The parties in Garza v. Idaho, the Supreme Court case decided last month, did not question Gideon, and they did not question that defendants have the right not just to any lawyer, but one that is competent and effective. All of that was assumed. But Thomas didn’t care. His dissent, joined in full by Justice Neil Gorsuch, argued that Gideon was wrongly decided because it exceeds “the original meaning of the Sixth Amendment.” According to Thomas and Gorsuch, the Constitution does not actually provide the right to a lawyer at all; it protects only the right to hire a lawyer if you want one.
Thread of legal hubbub
Dissent's do not mean anything, they're purely academic. They may signal arguments that future litigants can use if the court is starting to shift on a certain policy, but they have no substantive meaning.
I assume that is what you were getting at. I didn't read anything except your excerpt.
I assume that is what you were getting at. I didn't read anything except your excerpt.
-
- Posts: 8950
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am
Thread of legal hubbub
I was actually more curious whether you think their dissent has any merit and/or their possible reasoning behind it.
-
- Posts: 27522
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm
Thread of legal hubbub
Sounds like libertarian hogwash.
Thread of legal hubbub
I don't think it has merit, no.
6A:
If you have an earnest interest in how we got here the book Gideon's Trumpet: How One Man, a Poor Prisoner, Took His Case to the Supreme Court - and Changed the Law of the United States is exceptional. Very well written, accessible, and an intriguing story. A good read generally and is on point for this issue.
6A:
It's pretty plain to me. If it's a right, and the person can't afford it, then it needs to be provided. And in accordance with the Rules of Professional Conduct the assigned attorney needs to be competent.In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
If you have an earnest interest in how we got here the book Gideon's Trumpet: How One Man, a Poor Prisoner, Took His Case to the Supreme Court - and Changed the Law of the United States is exceptional. Very well written, accessible, and an intriguing story. A good read generally and is on point for this issue.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mikey, skullman80 and 119 guests