yeah, you're out of your mind if you think I'm downloading that.I received a bizarre voicemail today from a washington dc phone number. It says its a message from the year 2029 and hillary clinton starts world war three on purpose. I recorded it; here's the link.
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?fi ... 3506413878
it's a MP3 I converted from a wave file as I recorded the voicemail from my speakerphone to my desktop.If you're talking a 0.00000000001% chance vs. a 0.000000000001% chance, then sure, I can agree to that.Just like Hilary will appoint ones that will take Shyster's guns.Sure, Trump would appoint justices that would overturn it.Am I missing something...? Abortion is already a thing, so is the idea that Trump would overturn Roe vs Wade?
More of a chance of this happening than overturning roe v. Wade.
The idea of term limits is anti-democratic, as it assumes that the average voter is incapable of voting a politician out of office if he/she is not doing his job. So instead, let's throw out everyone, the good with the bad, and bring in inexperienced people who will need at least a couple of years to figure out their jobs. Incompetence would reign if this were to happen.Term limits, like voter id, seems like a good idea on the surface but I want knowledgeable experienced people serving. It's up to the voters to replace them.Term limits. You have X amount of time to get something accomplished and then it's right to the glue factory...
Yeah, I can't imagine what that might look like...Source of the post Incompetence would reign if this were to happen.
Let us see, congressional approval is at record lows and yet people keep voting these people in. Tell me again how the average voter is capable of voting correctly?The idea of term limits is anti-democratic, as it assumes that the average voter is incapable of voting a politician out of office if he/she is not doing his job. So instead, let's throw out everyone, the good with the bad, and bring in inexperienced people who will need at least a couple of years to figure out their jobs. Incompetence would reign if this were to happen.Term limits, like voter id, seems like a good idea on the surface but I want knowledgeable experienced people serving. It's up to the voters to replace them.Term limits. You have X amount of time to get something accomplished and then it's right to the glue factory...
Trump bringing mother of Benghazi victim and Obama's half brother to debate tomorrow.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... -his-guest
Yep, and all the real power and knowledge would be with the legislative aides.The idea of term limits is anti-democratic, as it assumes that the average voter is incapable of voting a politician out of office if he/she is not doing his job. So instead, let's throw out everyone, the good with the bad, and bring in inexperienced people who will need at least a couple of years to figure out their jobs. Incompetence would reign if this were to happen.Term limits, like voter id, seems like a good idea on the surface but I want knowledgeable experienced people serving. It's up to the voters to replace them.Term limits. You have X amount of time to get something accomplished and then it's right to the glue factory...
I'm no *****. I listened to it and they're nuts.
Add three Scalia's to the court and RvW would be overturned. Add three Ginsburg's and minimal gun laws would be preserved. No one outside of the a small group of loons wants to repeal the 2nd amendment. A large percentage of the population wants to make abortion illegal.If you're talking a 0.00000000001% chance vs. a 0.000000000001% chance, then sure, I can agree to that.Just like Hilary will appoint ones that will take Shyster's guns.Sure, Trump would appoint justices that would overturn it.Am I missing something...? Abortion is already a thing, so is the idea that Trump would overturn Roe vs Wade?
More of a chance of this happening than overturning roe v. Wade.
I'm not sure that's accurate. There is a sizable portion of the population that favors extremely strict gun control measures. There's also a sizable portion of the population that may not want to repeal it, but seriously "restrict" it.No one outside of the a small group of loons wants to repeal the 2nd amendment.
An email leaked by WikiLeaks Tuesday appears to suggest that Hillary Clinton wants the Affordable Care Act to fail — presumably as a pretense for implementing single-payer, government-controlled health care.
In a chain between Clinton and her senior policy adviser Ann O’Leary titled “Memo on Cadillac Tax for HRC,” Clinton said she’s open to changing her position on the Cadillac Tax — but that the Republican plan to repeal it must pass.
Excuse my ignorance on the subject, but how could voter id laws be a bad thing?Term limits, like voter id, seems like a good idea on the surface but I want knowledgeable experienced people serving. It's up to the voters to replace them.Term limits. You have X amount of time to get something accomplished and then it's right to the glue factory...
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], skullman80 and 186 guests
