I need a ruling on this
-
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:27 pm
I need a ruling on this
hmm. so if you want to make a left from the other side of a 4 way boulevard with a center lane it's illegal to pull across 2 lanes and into the center lane and then wait with your right blinker on? I'd belive it since it can be very dangerous
I need a ruling on this
Oh everyone does it. But I'm just guessing by letter of the law it'd be the same as the guy making a left turn without stopping and merging and pulling out in front of you, in our example
-
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:27 pm
I need a ruling on this
haha i edited. if it's 2 lanes of traffic forcing you to settle for the center lane then you can't predict someone won't be turning into that lane
I need a ruling on this
I would think Turn Lane Guy has heightened responsibility because he's technically joining traffic, right? I don't think his merge is regarded the same as yours; would he just be regarded as a left-hand turn?
Be that as it may, that's super common practice here. People making left hand turns on to super busy blvds from non-controlled intersections, but they can only cross the nearest lanes of traffic, so they just post up in the center turning lane until they can merge and complete the turn.* If I go out running errands, I'll reliably see that happen at least 2x.
*
Be that as it may, that's super common practice here. People making left hand turns on to super busy blvds from non-controlled intersections, but they can only cross the nearest lanes of traffic, so they just post up in the center turning lane until they can merge and complete the turn.* If I go out running errands, I'll reliably see that happen at least 2x.
*
I need a ruling on this
Edit: I did not see subsequent replies prior to posting, haha
-
- Posts: 2651
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:27 pm
I need a ruling on this
lol i thought about going through all of that preamble to try for clarityI would think Turn Lane Guy has heightened responsibility because he's technically joining traffic, right? I don't think his merge is regarded the same as yours; would he just be regarded as a left-hand turn?
Be that as it may, that's super common practice here. People making left hand turns on to super busy blvds from non-controlled intersections, but they can only cross the nearest lanes of traffic, so they just post up in the center turning lane until they can merge and complete the turn.* If I go out running errands, I'll reliably see that happen at least 2x.
*
I need a ruling on this
I believe it's legal to turn into the middle lane, but you can't travel down the middle lane. So turn into it and stop. Then when clear merge into traffic.
What you're describing is no different than moving from the left lane to the right while a car is trying to merge coming up the on ramp. It's his responsibility to do so safely, but your actions made his life more difficult then it needed to be.
What you're describing is no different than moving from the left lane to the right while a car is trying to merge coming up the on ramp. It's his responsibility to do so safely, but your actions made his life more difficult then it needed to be.
-
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am
I need a ruling on this
To hijack this.
Yesterday I was picking up groceries at Walmart. They have two rows of spots to park and wait. After my order was loaded up, I was backing out. Simultaneously, a guy in the row behind be backed out. I'm thinking we were both in the other's blind spot. It wasn't super close before I saw him and stopped, but if we'd have hit, how would fault have been determined?
Yesterday I was picking up groceries at Walmart. They have two rows of spots to park and wait. After my order was loaded up, I was backing out. Simultaneously, a guy in the row behind be backed out. I'm thinking we were both in the other's blind spot. It wasn't super close before I saw him and stopped, but if we'd have hit, how would fault have been determined?
-
- Posts: 11637
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:27 pm
I need a ruling on this
This happened to me about 4 years ago and we did hit. Neither of us had much damage so we didn't take any info. Later I noticed a small dent in our tailgate, but purely cosmetic.To hijack this.
Yesterday I was picking up groceries at Walmart. They have two rows of spots to park and wait. After my order was loaded up, I was backing out. Simultaneously, a guy in the row behind be backed out. I'm thinking we were both in the other's blind spot. It wasn't super close before I saw him and stopped, but if we'd have hit, how would fault have been determined?
I'd have to assume you'd both be at fault in this situation.
I need a ruling on this
That sounds like 50-50 without knowing other things like cross traffic, lane markings, etc.
-
- Posts: 27873
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm
I need a ruling on this
I left an unopened pack of chicken sausage on the counter overnight last night.
Okay to cook and eat, or do I throw out?
Okay to cook and eat, or do I throw out?
I need a ruling on this
Cook it to an internal temperature of at least 140F and then chow down.
-
- Posts: 43036
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
I need a ruling on this
Might be fine, but not worth it for me...
I need a ruling on this
I would absolutely throw it out. Nothing is worth getting salmonella or even risking it.
I need a ruling on this
Well, there you go. The panel is split 1-1-1. Enjoy.
-
- Posts: 30828
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
- Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you
I need a ruling on this
Was it precooked?
I say throw it out, but if it was precooked….I might think about it
I say throw it out, but if it was precooked….I might think about it
-
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am
I need a ruling on this
What's the temp in your house? Was it frozen?
I need a ruling on this
I was assuming it was precooked and frozen the night before. My wife likes that kind of chicken sausages as easy dinner meals.
The sausages would have had to be thawed for over four hours to even start becoming a hazard.
I did check and 150F is better for salmonella.
The sausages would have had to be thawed for over four hours to even start becoming a hazard.
I did check and 150F is better for salmonella.
-
- Posts: 15529
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 3:13 pm
- Location: dodint is a millennial
I need a ruling on this
If it was between 40 and 140 F for longer than 4 hours it belongs in the trash.
-
- Posts: 43036
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
I need a ruling on this
I assumed it was not frozen. Otherwise, he would have said, "hey, I thawed out some chicken sausage and plan to enjoy it later. Just thought you should know."
-
- Posts: 27873
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm
I need a ruling on this
Precooked.
House was probably 70
House was probably 70
I need a ruling on this
Chicken sausage ain't worth the risk.
-
- Posts: 27873
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm
I need a ruling on this
Google says throw it out.
Just threw it away
Just threw it away
I need a ruling on this
But there are starving Uyghurs in China.
-
- Posts: 43036
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
- Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
- Contact:
I need a ruling on this
Not for long...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests