I need a ruling on this

LeopardLetang
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:27 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby LeopardLetang » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:03 am

hmm. so if you want to make a left from the other side of a 4 way boulevard with a center lane it's illegal to pull across 2 lanes and into the center lane and then wait with your right blinker on? I'd belive it since it can be very dangerous

willeyeam
Posts: 39952
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: hodgepodge of nothingness

I need a ruling on this

Postby willeyeam » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:04 am

Oh everyone does it. But I'm just guessing by letter of the law it'd be the same as the guy making a left turn without stopping and merging and pulling out in front of you, in our example

LeopardLetang
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:27 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby LeopardLetang » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:05 am

haha i edited. if it's 2 lanes of traffic forcing you to settle for the center lane then you can't predict someone won't be turning into that lane

tifosi77
Posts: 51908
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

I need a ruling on this

Postby tifosi77 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:08 am

I would think Turn Lane Guy has heightened responsibility because he's technically joining traffic, right? I don't think his merge is regarded the same as yours; would he just be regarded as a left-hand turn?

Be that as it may, that's super common practice here. People making left hand turns on to super busy blvds from non-controlled intersections, but they can only cross the nearest lanes of traffic, so they just post up in the center turning lane until they can merge and complete the turn.* If I go out running errands, I'll reliably see that happen at least 2x.




*
EB car approaches cross street that has 5 lanes of traffic (2 each NB and SB, +center turning lane); he stops at the stop sign to prepare to make a left turn NB onto the cross street. There's a gap in the near SB traffic, so guy turns left across those lanes, and pulls up and stops in the turning lane facing NB. When a gap opens up in the NB traffic he merges to complete the turn and heads off NB.

These half-turns are usually done without any regard for the cross traffic in the desired direction of travel. So from the example, if you're one of the cars headed NB, you will have to deal with someone breaking out on your left and speed merging into the turn lane alongside you, and you just have to sort of trust that's all they're planning on doing. 99% of the time it works every time. But I've seen a couple instances where best intentions did not yield favorable outcomes.

tifosi77
Posts: 51908
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

I need a ruling on this

Postby tifosi77 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:09 am

Edit: I did not see subsequent replies prior to posting, haha

LeopardLetang
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:27 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby LeopardLetang » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:21 am

I would think Turn Lane Guy has heightened responsibility because he's technically joining traffic, right? I don't think his merge is regarded the same as yours; would he just be regarded as a left-hand turn?

Be that as it may, that's super common practice here. People making left hand turns on to super busy blvds from non-controlled intersections, but they can only cross the nearest lanes of traffic, so they just post up in the center turning lane until they can merge and complete the turn.* If I go out running errands, I'll reliably see that happen at least 2x.




*
EB car approaches cross street that has 5 lanes of traffic (2 each NB and SB, +center turning lane); he stops at the stop sign to prepare to make a left turn NB onto the cross street. There's a gap in the near SB traffic, so guy turns left across those lanes, and pulls up and stops in the turning lane facing NB. When a gap opens up in the NB traffic he merges to complete the turn and heads off NB.

These half-turns are usually done without any regard for the cross traffic in the desired direction of travel. So from the example, if you're one of the cars headed NB, you will have to deal with someone breaking out on your left and speed merging into the turn lane alongside you, and you just have to sort of trust that's all they're planning on doing. 99% of the time it works every time. But I've seen a couple instances where best intentions did not yield favorable outcomes.
lol i thought about going through all of that preamble to try for clarity :thumb:

CBear3
Posts: 7768
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:02 pm
Location: KC, MO

I need a ruling on this

Postby CBear3 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:26 am

I believe it's legal to turn into the middle lane, but you can't travel down the middle lane. So turn into it and stop. Then when clear merge into traffic.

What you're describing is no different than moving from the left lane to the right while a car is trying to merge coming up the on ramp. It's his responsibility to do so safely, but your actions made his life more difficult then it needed to be.

AuthorTony
Posts: 8985
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

I need a ruling on this

Postby AuthorTony » Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:02 pm

To hijack this.

Yesterday I was picking up groceries at Walmart. They have two rows of spots to park and wait. After my order was loaded up, I was backing out. Simultaneously, a guy in the row behind be backed out. I'm thinking we were both in the other's blind spot. It wasn't super close before I saw him and stopped, but if we'd have hit, how would fault have been determined?

robbiestoupe
Posts: 11637
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:27 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby robbiestoupe » Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:16 pm

To hijack this.

Yesterday I was picking up groceries at Walmart. They have two rows of spots to park and wait. After my order was loaded up, I was backing out. Simultaneously, a guy in the row behind be backed out. I'm thinking we were both in the other's blind spot. It wasn't super close before I saw him and stopped, but if we'd have hit, how would fault have been determined?
This happened to me about 4 years ago and we did hit. Neither of us had much damage so we didn't take any info. Later I noticed a small dent in our tailgate, but purely cosmetic.

I'd have to assume you'd both be at fault in this situation.

tifosi77
Posts: 51908
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:07 pm
Location: Batuu

I need a ruling on this

Postby tifosi77 » Fri Mar 04, 2022 1:17 pm

That sounds like 50-50 without knowing other things like cross traffic, lane markings, etc.

Troy Loney
Posts: 27873
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby Troy Loney » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:05 pm

I left an unopened pack of chicken sausage on the counter overnight last night.

Okay to cook and eat, or do I throw out?

dodint
Posts: 59810
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby dodint » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:05 pm

Cook it to an internal temperature of at least 140F and then chow down.

mikey
Posts: 43036
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby mikey » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:10 pm

Might be fine, but not worth it for me...

Morkle
Posts: 23125
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:09 pm
Location: Pittsburgh

I need a ruling on this

Postby Morkle » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:10 pm

I would absolutely throw it out. Nothing is worth getting salmonella or even risking it.

dodint
Posts: 59810
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby dodint » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:12 pm

Well, there you go. The panel is split 1-1-1. Enjoy.

meow
Posts: 30828
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:53 am
Location: I have four degrees and am a moron. Don’t let that fool you

I need a ruling on this

Postby meow » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:13 pm

Was it precooked?

I say throw it out, but if it was precooked….I might think about it

AuthorTony
Posts: 8985
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:18 am

I need a ruling on this

Postby AuthorTony » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:14 pm

What's the temp in your house? Was it frozen?

dodint
Posts: 59810
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby dodint » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:15 pm

I was assuming it was precooked and frozen the night before. My wife likes that kind of chicken sausages as easy dinner meals.
The sausages would have had to be thawed for over four hours to even start becoming a hazard.
I did check and 150F is better for salmonella.

Lemon Berry Lobster
Posts: 15529
Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 3:13 pm
Location: dodint is a millennial

I need a ruling on this

Postby Lemon Berry Lobster » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:16 pm

If it was between 40 and 140 F for longer than 4 hours it belongs in the trash.

mikey
Posts: 43036
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby mikey » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:18 pm

I assumed it was not frozen. Otherwise, he would have said, "hey, I thawed out some chicken sausage and plan to enjoy it later. Just thought you should know."

Troy Loney
Posts: 27873
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby Troy Loney » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:18 pm

Precooked.

House was probably 70

nocera
Posts: 42549
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:47 am
Location: He/Him

I need a ruling on this

Postby nocera » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:18 pm

Chicken sausage ain't worth the risk.

Troy Loney
Posts: 27873
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 3:03 pm

I need a ruling on this

Postby Troy Loney » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:20 pm

Google says throw it out.

Just threw it away

dodint
Posts: 59810
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 1:39 pm
Location: Cheer up, bіtch!
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby dodint » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:21 pm

But there are starving Uyghurs in China.

mikey
Posts: 43036
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: More of a before-rehab friend...
Contact:

I need a ruling on this

Postby mikey » Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:29 pm

Not for long...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests