Fifth Avenue Forum

I did. We didn’t get the transcript so we don’t know what else was discussed.

I love how much everything this dumbass does affects your life. It’s hilarious watching some of you people.

Yes, it would make the thread a lot better if people didn't respond to your shitposting.

This thread would be much better if people didn’t **** their pants every time trump does something.

I'm having a hard time understanding how you think something like this is potentially not pants "shitting?" Are you on the fence that this is just run of the mill no big deal?

Sure trump should be held accountable for a lot of things. Most likely this as well. But do it at the ballot box. This country is being torn apart because of partisan dumbasses. And no I would never **** my pants like some ITT over a politician or trump being shown to be corrupt.

Unless it's Hilary, of course.

Unless it's Hilary, of course.

She is basically a female trump.

Yes, it would make the thread a lot better if people didn't respond to your shitposting.

This thread would be much better if people didn’t **** their pants every time trump does something.

I'm having a hard time understanding how you think something like this is potentially not pants "shitting?" Are you on the fence that this is just run of the mill no big deal?

Sure trump should be held accountable for a lot of things. Most likely this as well. But do it at the ballot box. This country is being torn apart because of partisan dumbasses. And no I would never **** my pants like some ITT over a politician or trump being shown to be corrupt.

so just let things go until we can vote in 2020?

https://www.c-span.org/video/?464509-1/ ... -complaint

every headline in the world: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused office and white house officials tried to cover it up

nobody: wait a year and maybe vote him out

https://www.c-span.org/video/?464509-1/ ... -complaint

nunes calling the memo from yesterday a "transcript" and the fact that certain smoking guns were missing from the "transcript" makes this whole situation a witch hunt.

So right, lets not derail by reacting to the shitposting.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?464509-1/ ... -complaint

nunes calling the memo from yesterday a "transcript" and the fact that certain smoking guns were missing from the "transcript" makes this whole situation a witch hunt.

I also didn't need to hear the phrase "Trump Nudes" this morning.

every headline in the world: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused office and white house officials tried to cover it up

nobody: wait a year and maybe vote him out

Proceed with the investigation. But using hyperbole or conjecture without getting all the facts from an investigation is not the way to do it.

every headline in the world: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused office and white house officials tried to cover it up

nobody: wait a year and maybe vote him out

Proceed with the investigation. But using hyperbole or conjecture without getting all the facts from an investigation is not the way to do it.

ITT who’s saying what you’re suggesting? I’m pretty sure a lot of us just want the complete facts, first.

every headline in the world: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused office and white house officials tried to cover it up

nobody: wait a year and maybe vote him out

Proceed with the investigation. But using hyperbole or conjecture without getting all the facts from an investigation is not the way to do it.

ITT who’s saying what you’re suggesting? I’m pretty sure a lot of us just want the complete facts, first.

Shmenguin went on a several paragraph rant about basically trump will call for unrest.

I'm pretty sure everybody here has called (or wanted to call) another poster in this thread a dumbass.
I think the other two are a bigger problem. I don't think prejudice=XXXism, and we do that a lot in here.


And for those of you arguing with nobody, we covered yesterday that he pretty well thinks they're all grossly corrupt. So while in a perfect world Trump needs to be held accountable ethically, the next person to sit at the desk is going to have their own skeletons so we might as well allow the people to decide which is more palatable.

Shmenguin went on a several paragraph rant about basically trump will call for unrest.

It's not out of the realm of possibility, though, based on the crap he spews at rallies. Improbable, but not impossible.

every headline in the world: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused office and white house officials tried to cover it up

nobody: wait a year and maybe vote him out

Proceed with the investigation. But using hyperbole or conjecture without getting all the facts from an investigation is not the way to do it.

ITT who’s saying what you’re suggesting? I’m pretty sure a lot of us just want the complete facts, first.

Shmenguin went on a several paragraph rant about basically trump will call for unrest.

Shmenguin went on a several paragraph rant about basically trump will call for unrest.

It's not out of the realm of possibility, though, based on the crap he spews at rallies. Improbable, but not impossible.

He just said this morning that the dems are trying to destroy the republican party, that republicans need to stay together and fight hard because the country is at stake.

Shmenguin went on a several paragraph rant about basically trump will call for unrest.

It's not out of the realm of possibility, though, based on the crap he spews at rallies. Improbable, but not impossible.

He just said this morning that the dems are trying to destroy the republican party, that republicans need to stay together and fight hard because the country is at stake.

every headline in the world: Whistleblower claimed Trump abused office and white house officials tried to cover it up

nobody: wait a year and maybe vote him out

Proceed with the investigation. But using hyperbole or conjecture without getting all the facts from an investigation is not the way to do it.

ITT who’s saying what you’re suggesting? I’m pretty sure a lot of us just want the complete facts, first.

Shmenguin went on a several paragraph rant about basically trump will call for unrest.

Talk about hyperbole, but this also can't be denied considering there have been alt-right attackers that have deliberately targeted dems because of the stuff he says. Do I think he's going to call for an attack like Shemnguin suggested? No, but this whole defend the party, gets awfully closed.