A Pittsburgh Penguins Hockey Message Board
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/
http://www.fifthavenueforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=19
Yes. Hilarious.Funny video either way.
there are plenty of good points in here, but this guy snorted 3 lines and decided to write a facebook post disguised as an official statement. if this is a raw, personal, emotional response to a horrible event, i get it, and we all have our moments. but a person of authority trying to censor speech is a hell of a thing to attach to official letterhead.
Agreed... the ONLY person in any POSSIBLE danger is the driver.
It shouldn’t be limitedto a fenced in area, but I draw the line at protesting on the streets. You could legitimately be putting a person’s life at risk in certain situations. Ambulances and such. So if a car/truck comes up to your protest (yes that driver shouldn’t be that aggressive) you better get the **** out of the way. If you don’t move in a reasonable amount of time and then start approaching the vehicle, that driver is allowed to defend themselves.@nobody
Yes. That’s the point of protesting. If they are in a right of way and subject to arrest for it, then call the police and they will be arrested. That’s how civil disobedience works. The mistaken notion that protest should be limited to a fenced in area is, IMO, preposterous. Inconveniencing the persons who are effectuating the policies you protest is the point; potential arrest for tresspass or similar charges is the risk protestors accept.
Moreover, your post makes an enormous assumption — that this individuals only route to get where they were going was via threatening to run over 5 or more protestors.
If my family is in the car and people did that, I’d floor the gas pedal.Agreed... the ONLY person in any POSSIBLE danger is the driver.
dozens of people surround your car and start beating on it. I'm sure you'd roll down the window and shake their hands.
Where’s the ambulance in that video or indication that an emergency is present?It shouldn’t be limitedto a fenced in area, but I draw the line at protesting on the streets. You could legitimately be putting a person’s life at risk in certain situations. Ambulances and such. So if a car/truck comes up to your protest (yes that driver shouldn’t be that aggressive) you better get the **** out of the way. If you don’t move in a reasonable amount of time and then start approaching the vehicle, that driver is allowed to defend themselves.@nobody
Yes. That’s the point of protesting. If they are in a right of way and subject to arrest for it, then call the police and they will be arrested. That’s how civil disobedience works. The mistaken notion that protest should be limited to a fenced in area is, IMO, preposterous. Inconveniencing the persons who are effectuating the policies you protest is the point; potential arrest for tresspass or similar charges is the risk protestors accept.
Moreover, your post makes an enormous assumption — that this individuals only route to get where they were going was via threatening to run over 5 or more protestors.
You're a murderer, good to know.If my family is in the car and people did that, I’d floor the gas pedal.Agreed... the ONLY person in any POSSIBLE danger is the driver.
dozens of people surround your car and start beating on it. I'm sure you'd roll down the window and shake their hands.
That would be self defense. And I’m not talking about this scenario, I’m talking if people came up to my car and literally started beating on my car while my family is in the car.You're a murderer, good to know.If my family is in the car and people did that, I’d floor the gas pedal.Agreed... the ONLY person in any POSSIBLE danger is the driver.
dozens of people surround your car and start beating on it. I'm sure you'd roll down the window and shake their hands.
“I’m glad you are a murderer. I’m glad you want people killed. Great person you are. “If my family is in the car and people did that, I’d floor the gas pedal.Agreed... the ONLY person in any POSSIBLE danger is the driver.
dozens of people surround your car and start beating on it. I'm sure you'd roll down the window and shake their hands.
Spot on description of something I don’t do.“I’m glad you are a murderer. I’m glad you want people killed. Great person you are. “If my family is in the car and people did that, I’d floor the gas pedal.Agreed... the ONLY person in any POSSIBLE danger is the driver.
dozens of people surround your car and start beating on it. I'm sure you'd roll down the window and shake their hands.
-nobody everytime a joke is made on this board
If the Trump administration had posted such a brief, it would have been national news all about Trump attacking the courts. But except for conservative outlets like Fox News and the Washington Times, it was pretty much crickets. That the brief was extraordinary is not in doubt. Even this post at ThinkProgress, while generally supportive of the brief, concedes that the "brief itself is less a legal document than a declaration of war" and that it concludes with a "threat":Also, I want to be sure I'm 100% up to speed.
Shyster posted a fake news article that asserted the Trump administration was saying bad things about the SCOTUS to the SCOTUS, and because not one single person responded to it that is therefore proof of wide-ranging TDS.
https://t.co/by3GYzCvnrNEW: Trump has asked advisers whether the U.S. can acquire Greenland, w/ @vmsalama @rebeccaballhaus @MichaelCBender
Trump’s GREENland New Deal.Do it Donald
https://t.co/by3GYzCvnrNEW: Trump has asked advisers whether the U.S. can acquire Greenland, w/ @vmsalama @rebeccaballhaus @MichaelCBender
Probably to lower the national average temperature to say there is no global warming. (I think I'm kidding)Do it Donald
https://t.co/by3GYzCvnrNEW: Trump has asked advisers whether the U.S. can acquire Greenland, w/ @vmsalama @rebeccaballhaus @MichaelCBender
Probably for geopolitical reasons. We already have exclusive military rights there.Probably to lower the national average temperature to say there is no global warming. (I think I'm kidding)Do it Donald
https://t.co/by3GYzCvnrNEW: Trump has asked advisers whether the U.S. can acquire Greenland, w/ @vmsalama @rebeccaballhaus @MichaelCBender