GDT #82: Pens @ Isles

[meow]

oh yeah Nieto is on the team

[MalkinIsMyHomeboy]

Give me an equivalent name of anyone - whether they're on the trade market or not - that you think makes sense. Or...I'll meet you even lower...give me a Penguin equivalent of who makes sense to you in a 1:1 trade.

"I'd trade Jarry straight across for another Puustinen" or "I'd trade Jarry for a 23 year old version of Lars Eller"

- Our prospect pool is deeper in the sense that Jeff Bezos just got a little bit richer. I'm sure it happened, but not in any meaningful way.

- A team taking on $10 million a year in contracts for the next 4+ years is extremely unlikely...it also means that we just give both players away (which is good in one instance, and bad is another, when you're giving away a top 10 goalie for free)...

"bottom 12 scoring winger", eh? I'll check my rolodex...

Jarry for a Bunting-type or a Peterson-type, then

[JC2]

A top 6 winger or top 4 defenseman? 4/20 isn't for a few days...

[JC2]

Knuckled in

[JC2]

Nice!

[mikey]

Nice job, Puus...

[stonewizard51]

That one counts...PUUSTY

[MalkinIsMyHomeboy]

not sure who complained about the Rags’ goal song a few weeks ago because the Isles goal song is the worst in the league by a large margin

[MalkinIsMyHomeboy]

god dammit that didn’t look good Rusty

[JC2]

not sure who complained about the Rags’ goal song a few weeks ago because the Isles goal song is the worst in the league by a large margin

That's me.

The Stars song was also made for them, contains 2 words, and is infinitely better.

[mikey]

Give me an equivalent name of anyone - whether they're on the trade market or not - that you think makes sense. Or...I'll meet you even lower...give me a Penguin equivalent of who makes sense to you in a 1:1 trade.

"I'd trade Jarry straight across for another Puustinen" or "I'd trade Jarry for a 23 year old version of Lars Eller"

- Our prospect pool is deeper in the sense that Jeff Bezos just got a little bit richer. I'm sure it happened, but not in any meaningful way.

- A team taking on $10 million a year in contracts for the next 4+ years is extremely unlikely...it also means that we just give both players away (which is good in one instance, and bad is another, when you're giving away a top 10 goalie for free)...

"bottom 12 scoring winger", eh? I'll check my rolodex...

Jarry for a Bunting-type or a Peterson-type, then

All right, so looking the other way on contracts for a moment...you'd do Jarry for Vladislav Gavrikov in LA or Tyler Bertuzzi in Toronto then it sounds like.

I'm not sure if that's quite enough for me. I'd need to be assured that I could get a trustworthy goalie somewhere along the way...I think Jarry is worth more to us than that type of deal...but it's not outlandish...

I think it's easier to find another Pettersson than it is to find a goalie of Jarry's caliber...so I'm unlikely to use that asset to acquire that need...

[mikey]

The player addresses the puck and gets contacted within a stride...I'm not sure I would have made that call to be honest...it looks kinda bad, but I don't think I'd make that call...

[JC2]

Bad penalty to take.

[nocera]

That was pretty.

[mikey]

Balls.

[Orlando Penguin]

I'm one offsides challenge away from a bingo.

[mikey]

I called a high touch live...so I feel good about this coming back...

[mikey]

I'm one offsides challenge away from a bingo.

Puustinen from Smith was wiped for this...unless you need another haha

[nocera]

I wasn’t aware you could review a high stick that doesn’t directly result in a goal.

[mikey]

I called a high touch live...so I feel good about this coming back...

Replay shows it above the shoulder for me...

[mikey]

Nonsense...

[meow]

that was high

[JC2]

That looked above

[Trip McNeely]

Some of these calls for the Pens of late have been blasphemy

[Gaucho]

sick league