Postby Defence21 » Fri Jun 26, 2015 8:42 am
The idea of having a pure sniper in Kessell on Crosby's wing makes me salivate with excitement. Then I step back and think of the reality, and while there's one real thick layer of great, there are a bunch of layers of bad to real bad.
1. Cap hit: His $8 million per year cap hit extends for another seven years, I believe. Add that to the Crosby, Malkin, Letang, and Fleury cap hits and this team is going to be exactly what they've stated they don't want to be: a two line team with a drastic drop-off and zero depth. Doesn't sound like a recipe for success.
2. Asset cost: Toronto does not have to trade Kessel. There likely is a decent market for Kessel. Those two factors combined mean Kessel isn't coming at a discounted price. If Rutherford wants Kessel, he's going to have to part with, as a start, one of Maatta or Pouliot, Kapanen, and next year's first rounder. And, again, that's likely just the start of it. There will be other pieces. If they expect Toronto to eat a part of Kessel's salary or take on a burdensome contract, such as Scuderi's, they'll want even more in return than the starting point (plus other pieces) mentioned above. How, exactly, are they going to fill the roster now, and more importantly in the future, given that they're trading away so much young talent? Doesn't sound like a recipe for success.
3. Age effect: Looking at points one and two make this deal a bad enough idea alone. Combine them and you'll see that not only are they setting themselves up for failure by means of cap hell, but now they're also losing some of the guys who factor to be cheap talent for years to get him. I am all about sustainability right now. This team NEEDS to start layering their stars. In Crosby, Malkin, Letang, and Fleury, they have a bunch of upper-20s stars. They'll be exiting their prime soon, and while they'll still be highly productive, having a new wave of young players -- obviously not quite as good as those mentioned above, but very good none-the-less -- will allow this team to be successful this year and for the long haul. You know, kind of the way Chicago has been, how Detroit was for so long, etc. This trade will empty a gas tank that already was near "E." Doesn't sound like a recipe for success.
4. Roster impact: I've alluded to this already, but adding Kessel is going to make this team very top heavy, as the balance of the roster will have to come cheaply. Given that many of the team's top, young, cheap players will be gone in such a deal means the roster will not only come cheaply, but likely won't be very good, either. Having a top-heavy, two-line team is not the way of success in the NHL. The teams that have repeatedly gone deep int he playoffs have rolled four lines capable of scoring. If we thought last year's roster was lacking in depth, we haven't even seen the start of it. Get used to quad-A players, has-beens, and never-will-bes filling out the bottom half of the roster. And get ready for a continued trend of early playoff exits. Doesn't sound like a recipe for success.
Kessel might be the best player on the market, but he's a homerun for a team that needs more in the way of doubles. This team needs a winger or two that are young (25 or younger), affordable (under $5 million), and talented. They're not growing on trees, and they won't come cheaply. But it is a much easier proposition to trade up-and-coming talent for young, proven talent that can help now and for years to come. The names of Hertl and Skinner have been mentioned, and these are perfect examples of what this team needs. It won't be easy to accomplish, but then again if it was easy to accomplish, it likely wouldn't be worth it.
Sorry for the long post, but this whole Kessel thing has had me thinking for the last 16 hours or so, and if it happens, barring a miracle where Rutherford fleeces Toronto, I will not be in the least bit happy. And those aren't words you often hear from my mouth about the Penguins.