Page 2 of 4
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:46 pm
by nocera
Not sure how you could overturn that.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:46 pm
by skullman80
lol whatever.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:46 pm
by JC2
He ain't stopping that puck contact or not
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:46 pm
by RonnieFranchise
I mean....
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:46 pm
by nocera
That’s bad.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:47 pm
by mikey
This is a bad call.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:47 pm
by Gaucho
joke
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:47 pm
by RonnieFranchise
I mean the offside was clear but that's bullshit
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:47 pm
by crusherstasiak
sigh
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:47 pm
by willeyeam
That's BS imo
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:49 pm
by Gaucho
welcome to the EPL
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:51 pm
by Trip McNeely
That’s a joke of a call
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:54 pm
by mikey
I'm pretty mad about this, uncharacteristically...I'm fired up.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:56 pm
by Pensfan17201
Very poor call
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:59 pm
by JC2
I feel like if refs can use judgement to call a goal "immenent" after a whistle similar to rakell earlier this year, they should be able to use that same judgment for an obvious goal despite minimal goalie contact.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:11 pm
by nocera
I feel like if refs can use judgement to call a goal "immenent" after a whistle similar to rakell earlier this year, they should be able to use that same judgment for an obvious goal despite minimal goalie contact.
Isn’t that exactly what they do with a goalie interference challenge?
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:21 pm
by JC2
I feel like if refs can use judgement to call a goal "immenent" after a whistle similar to rakell earlier this year, they should be able to use that same judgment for an obvious goal despite minimal goalie contact.
Isn’t that exactly what they do with a goalie interference challenge?
Pretty sure it's just a challenge for contact in the crease. The only judgement is who and how the contact was initiated. Guentzel touched him, so no goal. Touching him had no impact on the play, though.
That said, goalie interference calls have always been whacky.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:26 pm
by willeyeam
Sloppy sloppy pp
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:35 pm
by willeyeam
How many grade A chances can we get man
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:35 pm
by skullman80
Gotta bury one of those breakaways.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:35 pm
by meow
Surprised that move didn’t fall for Jake. I thought he sold the backhand enough to get the 5-hole open enough.
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:40 pm
by willeyeam
I guess that's why this guy played over Michael Houser at Rochester
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:51 pm
by willeyeam
Pens +185 right now. I like that
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 9:00 pm
by Gaucho
LGP
GDT #38: Pens vs Sabres
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 9:07 pm
by RonnieFranchise
Wow are we getting bent over in this game