So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Talk about your Pittsburgh Penguins
columbia
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:23 am
Location: South Baldwin Yinzer Strokefest

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by columbia »

Kicksave wrote:Is Sutter that much worse than Bozak?
You're attempting to have a serious discussion based on those lines?
Kicksave
Posts: 3114
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:41 pm
Contact:

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by Kicksave »

:(
shmenguin
Posts: 19041
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: people notice my car when its shined up

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by shmenguin »

Kicksave wrote:Is Sutter that much worse than Bozak?
At helping his wings score, undoubtedly. At lots of other stuff, nah.
mikey
Posts: 43790
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by mikey »

Bozak has a tendency to pass in the low to mid NZ...Sutter has a tendency to carry it and protect it on his backhand to the left side of the ice in an effort to get the puck across the attack line cleanly. With the gaps tightening tremendously in that area of the ice, the ability for the RHS Sutter to get off a pass on his forehand to Kessel across the ice is minimal.
Gaucho
Posts: 51071
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:31 pm
Location: shootzepucklefraude

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by Gaucho »

So you're saying there's a chance?
mikey
Posts: 43790
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:58 pm
Location: We got problems, that's for sure. Clean up the backyard, don't lock the door
Contact:

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by mikey »

Yes, one in a million.
cadams
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:27 pm

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by cadams »

We would be better off throwing Sundqvist out with Perron and Kessel in that scenario which would leave Farnham/Wilson-Sutter-Bennett as the 4th line and at that point you move Scuderi with Sutter to get depth anywhere you can get it since you would have over $6 million in cap being wasted.
Gaucho
Posts: 51071
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:31 pm
Location: shootzepucklefraude

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by Gaucho »

You're attempting to have a serious discussion based on those lines?
cadams
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:27 pm

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by cadams »

Gaucho wrote:You're attempting to have a serious discussion based on those lines?
Nothing I wrote there was anything close to being serious :D
Tico Rick
Posts: 3267
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 8:11 am
Location: Earth

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by Tico Rick »

cadams wrote:at that point you move Scuderi with Sutter
I think you're on to something in having Scuderi play forward. In fact I'd be tempted to have him on the power play. Just send him out and tell him to do the same thing in front of the opposing goaltender that he does in front of Fleury - flop around on the ice with his stick out. Who knows how many PP goals he'd get with pucks bouncing in off his rear end?
cadams
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:27 pm

So the Offensive Lines Will Be???

Post by cadams »

Tico Rick wrote:
cadams wrote:at that point you move Scuderi with Sutter
I think you're on to something in having Scuderi play forward. In fact I'd be tempted to have him on the power play. Just send him out and tell him to do the same thing in front of the opposing goaltender that he does in front of Fleury - flop around on the ice with his stick out. Who knows how many PP goals he'd get with pucks bouncing in off his rear end?
move as in trade
Post Reply