Nice. Hopefully that's enough to dissuade people from giving an "auto Hart" to McDavid because he hit 100 assists.

Nonsense...

I called a high touch live...so I feel good about this coming back...

Replay shows it above the shoulder for me...

I'm one offsides challenge away from a bingo.

Puustinen from Smith was wiped for this...unless you need another haha

I called a high touch live...so I feel good about this coming back...

Balls.

The player addresses the puck and gets contacted within a stride...I'm not sure I would have made that call to be honest...it looks kinda bad, but I don't think I'd make that call...

Give me an equivalent name of anyone - whether they're on the trade market or not - that you think makes sense. Or...I'll meet you even lower...give me a Penguin equivalent of who makes sense to you in a 1:1 trade. "I'd trade Jarry straight across for another Puustinen" or "I'd trade Jarry for a 23...

Nice job, Puus...

@Jim Nedeljkovic rules.

That's right ^

Give me an equivalent name of anyone - whether they're on the trade market or not - that you think makes sense. Or...I'll meet you even lower...give me a Penguin equivalent of who makes sense to you in a 1:1 trade. "I'd trade Jarry straight across for another Puustinen" or "I'd trade Jarry for a 23 ...

Smith seems to have a bit of jump tonight. Auditioning himself?

I noticed this too...

Red hot power play...

Passing it between Bunting's legs to get it out to the flank is really funny...that pass is supposed to be through a player facing the puck, you silly gooses...

I was addressing that to mimh, actually...you're off the hook haha (unless you're sarcastically answering for him, in which case, that's excellent )

So, what's the trade for Jarry that you think is reasonable and would move the needle for you? Just the foundation of a trade is fine...

"I would trade Jarry to [team] straight across for [player]"

I think that might help frame where you're coming from with this a bit...

Yeah, I'm glad for Rakell turning it around...he's a good player.

POJ microcosm right there haha

because one of those goalies could (keyword: “could”) have a higher perceived value by an NHL GM than a actual value and the Penguins need to improve markedly if they want to go from out of the playoffs to a contender the notion that we absolutely shouldn’t trade a guy who has been irrelevant despi...

Bortuzzo just fills the bottles there...

Why bother having a good goalie tandem that had success this year when you can try to ride one player into the ground (who isn't used to it) and go against league trends and proper player evaluation...? We literally already had this exact conversation. Meow's statement is all that is needed for me....

Why bother having a good goalie tandem that had success this year when you can try to ride one player into the ground (who isn't used to it) and go against league trends and proper player evaluation...?

I have no idea what correlation to make with some of those...Saros makes sense, Fleury kind of makes sense I guess...

"Good" and "Subban" never make sense...

I'd trade him for a forward prospect that has fallen out of favor somewhere...like Kaliyev in LA or something...

POJ will be traded in the offseason. They tried to find a new home for him during the season, but they couldn't find a deal that made sense.